Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I scanned a load of photos using a printer I had bought partly because it specifically did that.


However my son in law told me that the resolution was not high enough and it would be better to have them done by a specialist (which I never got round to).


If you are not bothered about that because you just want the memories, then that wouldn't matter, and I have no idea how much it would cost to have them done elsewhere (or even if my son in law was right) but it's something you might want to take into account.


And Fox is right, it's a very boring job and dust on the scans is not what you want ...

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Scanning is long winded at tedious.. The main

> problem is Dust.

>

> I have a scanner you can borrow. should that of

> been 50 - 100 negs. ?

>

> Foxy


Thanks Foxy, that's a kind offer. I think I have around 500-1000 (original typo) as I was quite a prolific photographer at the time. I do have a scanner, but not the time or patience to remove dust and dirt.


There are some online options but I don't want to risk sending them by post, rather do it myself or pay someone in south London.

For negatives I could never find a cost effective option for sending them out. I bought a Epson v500 negative scanner and although it's really really time consuming it is very effective. It has IR scratch and dust removal that seems to work pretty well. I have a little air puffer to clean the negatives before I scan them and a light box to weed out the out of focus photos of hedges and flowers that my gran used to take to use up a roll!


I've done about 3000 35mm and medium format negatives (20+ years of family photos) and it was a year long project. I still have a thousand 110s/16mm to do which is a project for this year.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not fair on the patients or the consultants, either. 
    • These very anti social fireworks went on for at least fifteen years and were unbearable for both humans and pets.    Was extremely relieved that they moved a couple of years ago.  Never experienced such close proximity loud fireworks before.   But the ones that go off in the middle of the night are also very upsetting and annoying.  
    • Not they've gone. Everything has been ripped out. No sign of anyone new yet. 
    • The frequency of fireworks seems to be increasing. If revellers selected the low noise variety that would help, but the trend seems to be the louder the better. I do not think sensitivity to stimuli is the same as timidity. Unexpected, extremely loud bangs and unusual noises will startle most of us. Humans, unlike other animals, have the luxury of knowing what fireworks are and what the noise represents. Some animals do learn to cope but many do not. It could be their hearing is not as sensitive. We should not forget that many animals, including cats and dogs have hearing that is much more developed than ours.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...