Jump to content

Is the past sometimes best left in the past?

Otta

By Otta
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Lordship 516

Lordship 516

Posted
Posted

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jaywalker Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > womanofdulwich Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Haven't we all made mistakes?

> > > I don't mean murder, but as we get older and

> > > worldlier don't we all realise we treated

> > people

> > > badly/misinterpreted others actions?

> > > I would not make the mistakes again-but I am

> > > guilty - the list is long...

> >

> > The sentiment is admirable. But who have you

> > installed in the tribunal of your own reason to

> > find yourself guilty? Did you think that this

> > phantasm was of your own devising?

>

> You're single, right?


Why the snide attack on the person..?

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > jaywalker Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > womanofdulwich Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Haven't we all made mistakes?

> > > > I don't mean murder, but as we get older

> and

> > > > worldlier don't we all realise we treated

> > > people

> > > > badly/misinterpreted others actions?

> > > > I would not make the mistakes again-but I

> am

> > > > guilty - the list is long...

> > >

> > > The sentiment is admirable. But who have you

> > > installed in the tribunal of your own reason

> to

> > > find yourself guilty? Did you think that this

> > > phantasm was of your own devising?

> >

> > You're single, right?

>

> Why the snide attack on the person..?


I don't wish, and I'm sure s/he wouldn't wish me to, speak for Seabag, but I took it that s/he was making a rather amusing joke that if you've got a partner you've got someone to make you feel guilty, no need to devise your own guilt - pretty sure s/he wasn't making a personal attack.

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I got the notion of it being a joke but it was a

> pointed barb ...lacked any humour for me....


Sorry, can't see it - just a joke about the nature of being in a couple as far as I was concerned.

Seabag

Seabag

Posted
Posted

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lordship 516 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I got the notion of it being a joke but it was

> a

> > pointed barb ...lacked any humour for me....

>

> Sorry, can't see it - just a joke about the nature

> of being in a couple as far as I was concerned.


Well done RH, maximum points to you.


0 points to Lordship.

Seabag

Seabag

Posted
Posted

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can see it (the joke I mean not the thing about

> it not being a joke) and thought it was funny -

> and believe "who have you installed in the

> tribunal of your own reason" is the basis for a

> perfect dinner party game slash R4 panel show.


Hosted by Nicholas Parsons ?

jaywalker

jaywalker

Posted
Posted

I thought Otta's OP was quite a serious one.


How does one approach it?


Presumably, we all bring to bear what resources we can.


No doubt I should try harder to make my points clearer. You have said before that the kind of language I used above is pretentious and vacuous (and this is certainly always a danger). But, for me, the OP raises a question that is both important and very difficult to get at. You can say my points make no sense, but I'm not sure that this is true (mainly because I have no new ideas and have to plunder them from elsewhere even if I do try to put them in my own words).


I use ordinary and direct language when I'm posting about car parking, pheasants or pavements: not sure that will get us very far with the OP.


But you are probably right, the tribunal of the EDF forum is a good place to come face to face with one's own pretentiousness: and at this time of year gardening suddenly looks more interesting.

jaywalker

jaywalker

Posted
Posted

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can see it (the joke I mean not the thing about

> it not being a joke) and thought it was funny -

> and believe "who have you installed in the

> tribunal of your own reason" is the basis for a

> perfect dinner party game slash R4 panel show.


glad you have such a great sense of humour maxxi.


why is the quotation the basis for a perfect dinner party game?


do we judge ourselves autonomously? my point was that we do not.


the phrase 'tribunal of reason' is, I admit, derivative: but I guess you just think its a joke.

Lordship 516

Lordship 516

Posted
Posted

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lordship 516 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > @Seabag

> >

> > ...always happy to receive 0 points from you.

>

>

> You say 'happy' but do I detect a little bit of

> 'prickly' Mr 516?

>

> Ok I'll give you a +1, is that better ?


...nope...when I say I'm happy, then I mean happy..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • ianr
      Poundland East Dulwich soon to be replaced by Tesco Express

      By ianr · Posted

      Alternatively, here's the whole caboodle. Reference    25/AP/1351 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new ATM with associated security camera and light. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference    25/AP/1352 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new louvre. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference   25/AP/1353 Display of 1 no. new non-illuminated box fascia with vinyl lettering, 1 no. new box fascia with internally illuminated acrylic lettering, 2 no. new non-illuminated box fascia, 2 no. new internally illuminated projecting signs and 1 no. new vinyl to be applied around ATM. 29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Advertisement Consent-GRANTED  Decided Mon 07 Jul 2025 The only Lordship Lane item I could find as granted in w/b 13 October was to do with replacement of Dulwich Library's heating system by an air heat pump. 
    • malumbu
      Oh Rachel....

      By malumbu · Posted

      Oh give it a break.  We have an MP who makes racist comments, yet our media (and what seems like this Forum) that generally hate Labour (and loved Johnson) are just out looking for the dirt. It's a move on, nothing to see here.  Particularly if she used a letting agency.
    • Mattia_Sanlorenzo
      Gas Safe Engineer Rob Mills

      By Mattia_Sanlorenzo · Posted

      Hi all, I highly recommend Rob Mills Gas Safe boiler engineer, helpful and knowledgeable. contact number 07952584171    
    • ianr
      Poundland East Dulwich soon to be replaced by Tesco Express

      By ianr · Posted

      I don't think a single all-inclusive URL is easily doable.  When you enter a search the system presents the result without any of one's search parameters added to the URL.  So I suggest you go to https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/search.do?action=advanced where you just need to enter the address -- use SE22 8EW -- and the  Date Received start date.  I used 1/1/2025.  The three Tesco applications, all minor things, were all made in May.  The Simple search that I'd done previously had no time limit, and didn't include anything else that might have been from Tesco in the last two years. Incidentally, when I searched on the address 29-35 Lordship Lane it did not pick up the Tesco applications, which were held as 29 - 35 Lordship Lane Grrr!  

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...