Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You may of received a leaflet about this from the Labour Party.


Royal Mail is proposing to close the Sorting Office on Silvester Road in East Dulwich.

This has been on the cards for a while now. If this were to happen East Dulwich residents

would have to travel to central Peckham to pick up undelivered parcels, oversized letters

and Recorded Delivery post.


The meeting will take place at The East Dulwich Community Centre 46-50 Darrell Road, SE22 9NL

on Tuesday 4th April at 7pm.


In attendance will be Helen Hayes, Member of Parliament for Dulwich and West Norwood.


Please come along and share your views on Royal Mails plans.


DulwichFox

Roundabout Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Surely people won?t attend ? If they use e-mail/s

> instead of letters via the Royal Mail service +

> on-line back statements ? etc-etc-etc.


The sorting office always has a queue throughout the day so is a valuable asset to the area.

Mainly for parcels as Pugwash pointed out.


Foxy

And also the queues will surely be massive, as all the East Dulwich people will add on to the existing Peckham parcel collectors.


They are bad enough already at the ED office.


I'll be at the meeting. I have already sent my views via the pre-paid form which was with the information about the meeting.

I find the sorting office very useful for collecting parcels, as I work FT and am in and out over the weekends doing family stuff as are lots of other people.


When I went the other day I was surprised they didn't have a petition or notice about the closure, tho perhaps the workers aren't bothered or have just accepted the decision? Would assume very likely some will be made redundant as a result of the closure.


I have posted back the questionnaire but can't make the meeting unfortunately (tho I fully support Helen - who seems to do very good work locally I might add)...

The workers there were not allowed to talk about the proposals..


It is possible they too were kept very much in the dark about what was going on.


I do not think the meeting will change anything. If the place is closing.. then it's closing.

I suspect there are many property developers dying to get their hands on the site


I still urge people to attend the meeting to show our disapproval of Royal Mail's decision to close this facility.


DulwichFox

Please do come along to the meeting at the Darrell Road Community Centre on Tuesday the 4th of April at 7pm to discuss the proposed closure of the sorting office. Myself and Helen Hayes, our local MP will be there to discuss the issue and listen to local concerns.

Everyone is welcome.


Yours Sincerely


Councillor Charlie Smith

Deputy Mayor of Southwark

East Dulwich Labour Councillor

> I have posted back the questionnaire


Whose questionnaire, and how does it arrive?


RM do provide alternatives to personal collection from the delivery office, so in making your case it might be prudent to mention any drawbacks in those. They're listed at http://www.royalmail.com/personal/receiving-mail/redelivery.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > I have posted back the questionnaire

>

> Whose questionnaire, and how does it arrive?


Mine came through the door with the information about the meeting.


It was from the local Labour party, who have arranged the meeting with Helen Hayes on Tuesday.


But in the latest SE22 magazine, James Barber has also asked people to contact him with their views.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ianr Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > I have posted back the questionnaire

> >

> > Whose questionnaire, and how does it arrive?

>

> Mine came through the door with the information

> about the meeting.

>

> It was from the local Labour party, who have

> arranged the meeting with Helen Hayes on Tuesday.

>

> But in the latest SE22 magazine, James Barber has

> also asked people to contact him with their views.


I spoke with James yesterday afternoon. He will be in attendance at the meeting..


Foxy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do none of you go abroad.  Tourist taxes are really common in continental Europe and do vary a lot city by city. They are collected by the hotels/rental apartments. They are usually a  tiny part of your holiday costs.  In Narbonne recently we paid €1.30 per person per night.  The next town we went to charge 80 cents per person per night. By comparison Cologne is 5% of your accomodation.
    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...