Jump to content

Dear Vivien at Ludlow Thompson


andrewmc

Recommended Posts

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1047134,page=3


Dear Vivien,


I arrived back in my property which is currently for sale to find two speculative letters from you detailing when it had gone on the market with Agent A and when that contract would end, and a second detailing when it went on with Agent B and how you could do something now that we were out of contract with both.


Firstly, it would not have taken a rocket scientist to determine whether you had had any dealings with that property in the past. You have and it was not good. In fact it was the worst experience i have had with an agent in a decade of letting. Read the entire link above.


Secondly i am 1000% positive you can do nothing. I am certain of this. The reason being, that unless you and LT have access to some secret online real estate service no one else is aware of, if someone is looking for a property in my area, mine is the first that comes up. So what you might be able to do that the others have not been able to escapes me.


The more important thing here though is that LT are a disgrace, ethically you (the business) demonstrated there was no depth to which you would not sink to make a pound and is that really the sort of business i would want representing my interests? I think not


So please stop dropping me notes. You could be the last agent open on lordship lane and i'd still never invite you in to my home.


Rgds


Andrew

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/149985-dear-vivien-at-ludlow-thompson/
Share on other sites

Because everyone should occasionally be reminded of just how awful they are and by sending speculative BS letters suggesting they could do something that others could not,0 warranted it.


They cost me thousands in time lost due to their unethical underhanded behaviour with not so much as an apology. So everytime they are stupid enough to remind me of their continued existence i will feel compelled to warn others off.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...