Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I joined Virgin last August and signed up for their 50mb package. Runs fast and so far have had good customer service.


Did lose broadband a couple of Sundays ago when a few others did as well. Back up and running after a couple of hours.


Same thing happened on Wednesday night around 7pmish. No fault showing on their service checker so called 150 and spoke to a guy who could see that there were some issues. He booked a visit for me the following afternoon (yesterday). The guy arrived in the timeslot quoted (although service was working again by then) and checked a few things in the local junction box. He said that there had been an outage in the area on Wednesday night but he had twiddled with a few things to improve my signal anyway.


Overall I must say that the Virgin service has been good in my experience, speed has been consistent, no faults with tv and telephone, good telephone support. That said, it will become an issue if these 'outages' become regular in frequency. With my old provider (lowly 1mb), although stone age in terms of speed, I do not recall ever needing to contact them during the 8-9 years of using them.

We had a bad connection for several weeks both wired and wireless. Called virgin and told them we are changing providers due to frustration. After some time on the phone turns out the cable modem was the older type (that connects to a wireless router). They came and switched it for a modern type, no additional wireless router needed anymore. All well now. They don't offer to exchange to new cable modems until the old one plays up.
In the last 12 months I can only remember losing service once and with a 10Mb service the speed has never dropped below 8.5. That's on Melbourne Grove, but when I lived on Marsden Rd the speed was a lot slower even though I was paying for a 20 Mb service. It does seem to be strangely patchy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...