Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SEN/Disabilities aside, anyone that lives within 2

> miles of their kid's primary school and drives

> them needs shooting. Just bloody walk, it's good

> exercise for your kids and for you.


The whole family or just the kids?


But seriously - while I generally agree (minus the shooting bit), and am wound up by people parking across my drive - you can't know what manner of complication is going on in people's morning routines that means driving is a better option (different schools across the borough, dropping off on way to far flung work, morning chores etc.).

I walked to school. Our kids walked to school. I am the people's poet. I am right.


On the downside the money saved on the bus fare went on sweets. I am suffering now.


Interesting observation. When I started primary school there were 140 kids coming on two double decker buses, one from the North and one from the south. By the time I'd left this was down to two single deckers. By the time I left secondary school this was down to a mini bus. And now probably a taxi for the odd kid who can't get a lift.


There's lots of stuff on risk adverse parents, but that should be for another thread. My friends moved to Scotland ten years ago and were shocked as the primary school kids all walked together without any parents.

Some schools operate walk-to-school "buses" - long crocodiles of escorted children. I get that roads can be busy, but being able to cross the road and to have a decent amount of road savvy is a prerequisite for daily life, so with the help of a lollypop person, walking to school for most children nine and above ought to be a given. Driving your kids to school is not a good idea for all sorts of reasons.

Does anyone know whether any of the schools ask parents about how they get their kids to school, or whether they promote walking and public transport? Perhaps if they don't, preferring to "mind their own business", it may be a good idea to do so.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I walked to school. Our kids walked to school. I

> am the people's poet. I am right.

>

> On the downside the money saved on the bus fare

> went on sweets. I am suffering now.

>

> Interesting observation. When I started primary

> school there were 140 kids coming on two double

> decker buses, one from the North and one from the

> south. By the time I'd left this was down to two

> single deckers. By the time I left secondary

> school this was down to a mini bus. And now

> probably a taxi for the odd kid who can't get a

> lift.

>

> There's lots of stuff on risk adverse parents, but

> that should be for another thread. My friends

> moved to Scotland ten years ago and were shocked

> as the primary school kids all walked together

> without any parents.



We walked - but were totally irresponsible (as children were then)


We'd just decide to go somewhere after school and not bother to

tell parents - cue loads of worried parents - but in the 70s you

were supposed to encourage children to be independent so they never

stopped us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...