Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My wife reads this forum and pointed out a debate about Operation Ore. It now appears to have been removed.


Why are some people so desperate to protect the elite and their crimes? I don`t claim to know everything on this subject, but I know a bit.


Lets start with the Dumblane shooting (March 1996), the gunman was Thomas Hamilton. I am not going into every detail, just those that the establishment would rather you forgot. Hamilton was known to the police as a peadophile, even as a scout leader. Hamilton was a Freemason and has asked senior Westminster politicians to assist him in obtaining a gun license. Because of these connection, the government decided to place most case documents under the "100 year rule". This was so say to protect the families involved. I might add, that the 100 year rule is usually used for International incidents. A few years ago, it was announced that these documents would be released...as far as I am aware, these documents have not been released.


Now I will move onto Soham girls: again, I am just going to cover the points they want you to forget. The two Man United shirts were found in a bin in an area that had already been searched by police and volunteer searchers...anyone could have placed the shirts there. The girls bodies were found just outside RAF/USAF Lakenheath. The bases security had recently been upgraded with advanced CCTV. Dispite the bodies being found outside Lakenheath, the police did not extend their investigation on to the base. At the time, we were in a fire building process leading to the illegal invasion of Iraq and of course, the Dr David Kelly murder. Its a well known fact that rape and sexual crimes are a major problem around US military bases. Here I will assume that the Home Office told the police to stay away from Lakenheath. Ian Huntley was arrested and sent to Rampton. What treatment did he recieve?? Even though Huntley was convicted, no one in the court believe his version of events..not even the judge. All that I will add, is that Huntley was brave to take on two 11 year old girls on his own..if he was on his own.


In the build up to the illegal Iraq invasion, the FBI sent the Met police a 5000 name SeXFile dossier...this was in the thread that my wife read to me and there were whining replies asking for the thread to be deleated and that people were peddling conspiracy theories...funny thing is, the police deal with conspiracy theories every day and they remain just that, until a court produces a conviction.


The British MSM reported that Government ministers, judges, senior police and military were on the FBI seXFiles dossier and as the poster said, these elite people have been protected. Operation Ore has been highly selective in picking its victims. Why did the FBI send the report when it did? Simple, more pressure on Tony Blair. The FBI mockingly stated that they could send a second seXFile dossier...but as we can see, the British police can`t, or are unwilling to deal with one FBI SeXFiles dossier.


These elite peadoghile rings are everywhere. In Washington, London and every Western center of power. It is even encouraged, because once you are in, they have all the leverage they will ever need, Its similar, but bigger that the Whips system in Parliament.


I have only touched on a few cases. There has been a recent case in Scotland and this has been totally ignored by the MSM, or should I say gagged. You can google "Hollie Greig" and read all about it...IT IS VERY SCARY STUFF. The establishment really isn`t what you think it is.


Everything in this post is totally factual, apart from my opinion on the Home Office blocking police going into RAF/USAF Lakenheath. Dr David Kelly was murdered. I have been in contact with an MP and many journalists who I have corrected. They have changed their positions, but progress on a full investigation is being hampered, because someone and another as yet unidentified person, moved Dr Kelly`s body in a 30 minute period between being found and the official Thames Police search party arriving. I might post on this case.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15187-elite-peadophilia/
Share on other sites

"These elite peadoghile rings are everywhere. In Washington, London and every Western center of power. It is even encouraged, because once you are in, they have all the leverage they will ever need, Its similar, but bigger that the Whips system in Parliament."


Everything factual eh? So just western powers? The eastern powers get a pass?


You nutjobs logging on to a local forum for the first time just to spread your madness sicken me

Hi Sean, thanks for your reply and I am pleased that you could not debunk anything that I said. Where does East snd West end and start? Maybe it would be easier to workout which Eastern nations are controlled by the West...maybe its easier the other way round...China, North Korea and maybe Burma. The rest are all controlled by the US/UK/Israeli axis.....no doubt in your book, I am "anti semitic by just mentioning "Israel"??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...