Jump to content

Ring Doorbell for Sale


Recommended Posts

I have a ring doorbell for my aunt online that took a lifetime for delivery so ended up buying one in the store directly. Now I just wanted to know if anyone wanted to buy it off me at the same price I paid for it before I call a courier to return it.


Bought for ?135 + 4.99 delivery total cost ?139.99.

Still in the delivered package so extremely new.


https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSDG3M0e2mGX9_qtHEtzj2Q





Thanks,


Stephanie

M: 07742016412

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/152489-ring-doorbell-for-sale/
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
Hi Stephy! did you sell it for a good price? A couple of months ago I was selling as well and could not sell it and I dropped the price by 20% in order to sell it. I did not like it at all and I bought from eBay for 100 pounds and could not return it back cause I was not careful enough and did not see that buyer was not accepting returns. When I sold the ring I bought a big pack including a wireless doorbell and door alarm bundle up to 120 pounds on https://www.1800doorbell.com/driveway-alarms/ website and they also gave me a discount cause they had sales. I will never ever be bought with beautiful advertisements again!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...