Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saffron Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > For example, if you post a pic of your colleague

> being drunk at a festival, and it leads to them

> losing

> > their job, then you could be held liable for

> damages.

>

> I'm not sure that's a great example, Saffron. I

> can't believe that would stand up in court.


Facebook has taken to asking for my approval when my friends post pictures of me.

7 dogs being walked.

8 dogs being walked.

Why do people have to use absolute extremes and exaggerations to try to make a point - it betrays the true situation as not being as dire as made out and being in need of over-cooking to achieve the agenda intended by the poster.

Let's see the evidence of that wild claim !

7/8 dogs my arse.


BTW - I saw a dog pooing a 3-tonne poo on a grave you know, I did, I did, honest. It was the size of a skip lorry, bloody dog walkers !

(get it ?)

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 7 dogs being walked.

> 8 dogs being walked.

> Why do people have to use absolute extremes and

> exaggerations to try to make a point - it betrays

> the true situation as not being as dire as made

> out and being in need of over-cooking to achieve

> the agenda intended by the poster.

> Let's see the evidence of that wild claim !

> 7/8 dogs my arse.

>

> BTW - I saw a dog pooing a 3-tonne poo on a grave

> you know, I did, I did, honest. It was the size

> of a skip lorry, bloody dog walkers !

> (get it ?)


Your last paragraph is petulant and childish. I've regularly seen dog walkers with 6 plus dogs. I've also had to point out unnoticed crap left by their dogs.


FYI, I don't want dogs to be restricted to on lead walks only. Dog walkers keep the parks etc alive in the wintertime especially.

Ah contraire - it's an accurate example of the type of wild claim above. Sometimes such an example is needed to draw attention to the real agenda and the disingenuous way it's being set-up.

So exaggerating dog numbers is grown-up.

But exaggerating dog poo amounts is childish.

Right, I think I get it now !

Isn't the issue one of control, not numbers? I have seen someone walking eight (albeit small) dogs on linked leads - 4 a hand, in a very controlled manner, and someone else incapable of looking after just 2. Dog walkers should be doing a good job - controlling however many dogs they can control and walking them sufficiently to be exercised. If they can control 8 and be paid (as it were) 8 times an hourly rate for just one - well good on them. If they can't and if the dogs they aren't controlling then act up (chasing other dogs or people, fouling in the wrong places etc.) then actions should be taken against them.


And it is quite possible that someone photographing dog walkers is indeed putting together a portfolio for an exhibition.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isn't the issue one of control, not numbers? I

> have seen someone walking eight (albeit small)

> dogs on linked leads - 4 a hand, in a very

> controlled manner, and someone else incapable of

> looking after just 2. Dog walkers should be doing

> a good job - controlling however many dogs they

> can control and walking them sufficiently to be

> exercised. If they can control 8 and be paid (as

> it were) 8 times an hourly rate for just one -

> well good on them. If they can't and if the dogs

> they aren't controlling then act up (chasing other

> dogs or people, fouling in the wrong places etc.)

> then actions should be taken against them.

>

> And it is quite possible that someone

> photographing dog walkers is indeed putting

> together a portfolio for an exhibition.



Once you say "heel" a dog should be right behind

you as if on a lead.


John aka Barbara Woodhouse

Dogkennelhillbilly and Loz

I'm a professional photographer and I have to carry consent forms and get them signed to release photographs of members of the public. It's also expected to ask permission (and also courtesy!). I am getting tired of people waving cameras and phones in my/ other people's faces as they please.

James Barber:


Yes, having spoken to there people about this, I am told the person is bragging about sharing those photos online. I think this is connected to 'Southwark's dogs consultation'.

I will thanks, I thought he might be taking photos of leaves before my head but he was pointing the camera in my direction. I became concerned afterwards when I heard other people (all with dogs) reporting the same behavior.
I pick up my dogs poop, as well as other people's dog poop when I come across it. When/ if dog walkers stop using this space, due to the unpleasant behavior they face daily, and are replaced by drug addicts, drunks, or people up to no good, people will miss having dog walkers/ owners keeping nature reserves safe for all to enjoy, service provided free of charge of course. People need to consider the benefits provided by dog owners. Unfortunately, some people are irresponsible, but those people will continue to ignore any new rules set up, will continue to not clean up after their dogs, will not exercise them properly, will not train them properly etc...
I would not do this as I am against our naming and shaming culture and as a photographer I am aware that you need to ask permission and use consent forms. The police will have to deal with it, but thank you for the advice!
I would advise those who feel that there is already sufficient in the council's armoury to control out of control dogs, dog walkers and dog owners (should they care to use the powers they have) to take part in the survey. Banning dogs from parks does not seem a sensible or nice thing to do. Neither is banning dog walkers. Making some areas of parks dog-free, or dogs-off-leads free may be a different issue, though there are many parks where these areas already exist. Encouraging (implicitly or explicitly) vigilante behaviour and 'shaming' web publication (if that is what is happening) is appalling. (NB I neither own, nor walk, dogs)
apparently he was challenged by other dog owners and responded that he was posting the images online, hence me being concerned and warning people walking in that area. Thanks for the advice :)
Well, the man I saw was not part of (the not so friendly) FONC, but this consultation seems to have comforted unwanted behavior from certain individuals into bullying dog lovers and walkers further (than they already are).
what they normally do for event photography etc... is put a note in entrances to make people aware that filming/ photographing is taking place, so that people who do not wish to be in a photograph can place themselves elsewhere. That's my experience, it's a tricky one...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years       Looks like Lucy Connolly will me one of those Reform candidates at next election tells you everything you need to know about that party and where the country would be headed 
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
    • I see that there was a government consultation started in July 2024, a response, and then a revision to the National Planning Policy Framework, and then to the Green Belt guidance in February 2025, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/green-belt .  It includes the updates but doesn't give the nescient much clue of what was materially changed. There will probably be some good, and less good, summaries to be found. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...