Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Daughter (2 next week) has just been diagnosed with suspected mumps. This is despite having had her first mmr jab. Hasn't yet had second booster due to various illnesses etc in the meantime. However as far as i understand it the traditional time to have the booster is aged 3 which is what I had chosen to do.


Been prescribed antibiotics. Birthday party this weekend has to be cancelled. Daughter seems ok so far, swollen neck, no fever. Doc says may get tummy ache, fever but doesn't seem too worried since had mmr. Got to try and keep five month old away. Dr says should not be contagious after 6-7 days.


Anyone heard of any mumps cases in the area at the moment? Any experiences or advice? Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15352-mumps/
Share on other sites

anna_r Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Daughter (2 next week) has just been diagnosed

> with suspected mumps.


Just curious... how do they confirm mumps these days? Is it obvious from syptomatic presentation in such a little one?


> This is despite having had

> her first mmr jab.


That's terrible bad luck. I hope your LO is better soon. Were you advised to continue with the combined MMR when she is recovered, or will she receive separate singles? I'm not aware that it should make any difference immunologically... just wondered what the general practice is for such a case.


Speedy recovery xx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15352-mumps/#findComment-402825
Share on other sites

Thanks! The doctor thought it was mumps from the swollen neck, which is much more obvious than swollen glands you get during other infections. She put an alert out to see if there were other cases in the area and I think if that comes back positive they'll do a salivary test. We have to go for a checkup next week. Not sure about the booster jab - good question, I will ask next week but expect it will still be the MMR.

She actually seems ok (fingers crossed) - a bit grumpy but not too bad and actually eating ok still with no fever. I think it's much better to get it as child anyway - if you're going to get it - and also not so bad for women as men because of the potential infertility problems for post puberty males. Just in case anyone else gets it thought it might be reassuring to know it's not too bad.

And birthday party rearranged for following week (dr says will not be contagious after s week) so things looking up!

X

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15352-mumps/#findComment-402880
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...