Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A class action was brought against Canon in the USA because printers died for no reason.


Mine and my son in law's included.


I posted on another thread a link to a forum full of disgruntled people whose Canon printers no longer printed.


I no longer look at the forum but when I left it was zillions of pages long.


Don't have time to look for it now but will do later if I have time.


Meanwhile, suggest you don't get another Canon.

Indeed.


I've always had Canon cameras, but never again after this.


I'm amazed it hasn't been more widely publicised. I only found out about it after googling the error message.


My printer was quite an expensive one and I could ill afford to replace it so soon.


I've got an Epson now.


I will never buy a Canon product again. Whatever the underlying cause of the issue, the way the company has dealt with it is disgraceful.

I have had my Canon Pixma ip6600 for nearly ten years and it still works a treat, never had any problems with it! The ink tanks are the biggest rip-off! Luckily mine are used in many different models so I can source replacement copies on eBay for ?1.00!

I guess I must be lucky?

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're not saying they've got built in

> obsolescence are you ?

>

> Imagine if that is the case .....OMG and some !!


I doubt this is the case. Printers are sold as a loss-leader - companies make their money selling ink. A broken printer gives people to opportunity to change brands, which would be counter-productive.


I think Hanlon's razor is applicable here: ?Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm reviving this thread especially for malumbu! Thanks for reminding me of it, mal! Now you'll probably have irrational rage because you couldn't find the thread. I just did a search for irrational 🤣
    • No I won't. This has nothing to do with Ryedale and everything to do with the way people approach news. 
    • I'm getting dozens of fliers a year from all the estate agents.  I'm not selling, thinking of selling or renting out. The one from John D Woods really got my goat as it is plastic coated so can't even be recycled.  I've emailed them.  They must be making so much money to to these mass mail outs.  I couldn't find the old thread about things that put you into an irrational rage (although this rage is not irrational) I have a nice time too watching GB win their first medal at the Winter Olympics - that is an understatement! I'll burn it, sod the tiny impact on air quality.   Post script, ok calmed down, the thing wouldn't burn and would set my alarm off anyway so outside charred.  The e-mail bounced back to what a great company.  But it would be interesting to hear views, serious or humorous about estate agent marketing
    • @PenguinYou will have to explain this to me bearing in mind your and others outrage at a possible new scheme on Ryedale, and the use by many on this forum of Southwark News to support their reaction. I don't know what precautionary mindset means.  The precautionary principle is that we need to act now for example in tackling climate change rather than wait twenty years for conclusive evidence (that was the situation in 2006 when Stern published his report) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...