Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have no idea what GIS is ,but currently involved in discussion with Southwark planning about disputed width of access road .

Going on for some years ,relates to access to backland .

Planning dept always refer this particular point over to Highways ,I always ask for site visit and measurement ,but this never seems to happen .

Various figures have been quoted by council representatives ,architects et al .

Latest response is from Southwark quoting reference to GIS mapping .

Does anyone know if this is equivalent of visiting site and measuring ?

Sorry if I'm being dense here .

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15780-how-accurate-is-gis-mapping/
Share on other sites

Not being dense at all.


People often confuse GIS with satellite location systems, remember that these have quite wide margins of error and then wonder about their accuracy.


However GIS is a more of a catch-all term for all the different ways the geography of an area can be measured.


In that sense, when a worker rocks up and measures the road with a tape they're actually contributing to the GIS. They're not two different things.


For the most part, modern GIS systems are populated using photographs. Certain distances on the photograph will be measured very accurately, and then the information for surrounding areas calculated from comparing the locations in the photograph.


In general it's regarded as very accurate.

Thanks .

Well given Southwark's reluctance to visit and use a tape measure ,I'm guessing that this GIS will be dependent on photographs ,or ( head hurting here ) working back from a marker that designates a point that someone did actually measure ?

So do you think that modern technology can give a measurement from a photograph which is accurate to within 0.1 of a metre ,or as I tend to think of it ,nearly 4 inches ?

( no comments please about the contradictory nature of my desire for accuracy and my use of the term "nearly ".?

Thanks ianr - then I guess I measure and scale it off the map ?

But will the data it's based on be valid in the first case ?( photos I guess ok ,but ....what else ,extrapolations from other distant points ? )

I just can't quite get my head ( aged and neither numerate nor technlogically up to date ) round depending on something that feels remote and dependent on variables ( photos v.other measurements ... )as producing results that are accurate to within the odd half ,and less ,metre .( a unit which I'm not even sure I know how to spell .)

The Ordnance Survey technical standard for "accuracyofposition" data is:


"1.0m Urban data capture standards (1:1250 scale). This is the nominal accuracy of a point position at the 99% confidence level."


This means a 5 metre line measured by tape on the ground could be between 3 metres and 7 metres when scaled off a map.


Before Southwark Council makes assertions about the accuracy of its GIS mapping it needs to specify:


1) the accuracy of the data set input to the GIS software

2) the paramaters used in manipulating the data set within the GIS software

3) the accuracy of the output presentation from the GIS software.


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...