Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ha ha!


Your interpretation of the events is erudite but I feel it's too educated.


It's far more likely that people voted in the way that Cameron's deal with News International was engineered to deliver.


The price the nation paid for that deal was the loss of electoral reform and Tory agreement to the Sky TV deal that allows Rupert Murdoch to dominate our entire media landscape.


Cameron has has not only ripped democracy from our hands, he has even limited our ability to be any better informed. Murdoch has been influencing elections for years, now he owns them.


It's a tragedy at so many levels

Nonsense. Conspiracy theory at it's most exalted. You're saying people are mere behavioral animals with no minds of their own but you, the enlightened one, can see through all the subterfuge.


You'll be telling us next you've seen Osama bin Laden chatting with Elvis

I can see through your subterfuge silverfox, but then I think a blind warthog in a cellar with the lights turned off sporting a blindfold could do that.


The 'No' campaign including yourself persistently lied to voters and treated them like gormless sheep. The only reason the electorate didn't know this was because Britain's biggest selling newspapers repeated these lies and endorsed their dishonesty.


I don't think the people are 'animals with no mind of their own', that's what the 'No' campaign thinks. I think the people were ripped off and decieved by greedy, self-serving but terribly efficient liars.


If you bother to use any sort of discretion in your media selection then you'd be surprised what you can learn.

Just keeping you on your tippee toes Huguenot. I realise you're tired and emotional given the recent fiasco.


It was sad to see you begging on the morning of the election with that new thread babbling on about saving the nation. Very jingoistic of you if I may say so.

thomastillingthe3rd Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ......Rupert Murdoch? oh please give me a

> break....he'll be dead soon and they will break it

> all up and sell it in chunks, have no fear of

> that.


I think you'll find James Murdoch will take over the reins. And he's quite a chip off the old block.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I accidentally drove off and left a red travel longchamp bag with various clothes / makeup in on Dovercourt Road earlier today... if anyone managed to pick it up please do let me know!  Nothing valuable is in it, just clothes and make-up that I'd love to get back if I can! 
    • Tickets were quite expensive...
    • What about Dulwich park? 
    • Looking at the areas which will be receiving funds, there seems to be a couple of pretty fundamental flaws with the scheme. In many of these areas, spend isn't migrating from high streets to online, there simply isn't any disposable income to migrate. No amount of tarting a place up is going to change the fact that these places are the poorest and most deprived in country - people simply have nothing to spend. Secondly, a lot of these areas no longer have an extant retail infrastructure to improve upon - it went donkey's years ago, along with the pubs. My childhood high street is getting a grant. Maybe they'll liven up Market Street by celebrating our notable locals - they could commission a Ricky Hatton mural, a statue of The Moors Murderers or a 'Walk of Shame' pavement for Harold Shipman's victims (it's quite a long street). But, whatever it is, I doubt it's going to show a decent return when the only businesses still trading are 'Bargain Booze' outlets, Bangladeshi takeaways, bookies and barbers.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...