Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is probably obvious but I can't figure it out from the planning permission website....


.... we have 2n high fence adjoining a footpath. Can this be replaced with a wall the same height?


Planning permission regs state permission is not required if a fence or wall is being replaced with one the same height but I don't know if this valid only for like-for-like replacements i.e fence with fence rather than fence with wall.


Would appreciate advice from those in the know or who have done this in the past.


Thanks

Thanks - the problem is the advised limit is 1m for fences/wall by a footpath & planning permission is needed for anything higher. However, planning permission is not needed if replacing a pre-existing fence/wall of whatever height with one of the same height. I am just not sure if a fence can only be replaced with a fence.

Will see if I can get any answers from the council & will feedback.

Don't think you need planning permission for any wall under two metres unless it's adjoining a highway or the footpath to a highway (in which case you need PP for over a metre), so if your footpath is just a cutthrough or alley you should be fine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I completely agree with you . Its as if they have their foot in the door and are just pushing and pushing. It's ridiculous. It's not the right space. they clearly do not give any regard to the environment or they would move it.  
    • There's a great badminton club at the Harris girls academy. It runs Friday from 5.30 to 6.45. for more experienced players, they have sessions on Wednesday and Friday, too but that's subject to skill levels 
    • There seem to be all sorts of blocks for this event being mounted on the Common, one is that it was 'designed especially' for the current site, though the organisers seem to have had absolutely no problem rejigging their plans to the original site footprint to expand the event to what we had last year- which I think really imposed on a large part of the park and spoilt the feel. I would suggest pressing very hard for relocation to the Common ( also closer to transport links). There must be a way, surely? If not, then wholesale relocation to a more suitable venue. I just do not think the park should be subjected to a festival-goer footfall of 60,000 plus over the summer.
    • I absolutely will. Fed up of property developments that are funded from offshore investors and price out local people. Fed up of the demise of social rents and the growing crisis of families in bed and breakfast. Fed up of young people being unable to save deposits, start families and generally have the same security of tenure that previous generations had. So yes, I will drill down into the financing, affordability, where the properties aer being advertised for sale, and how many are genuinely for social rent. Otherwise, no opposition to redeveloping that site in that way. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...