Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Brendan,


Have you ever tried to bid for a gov't contract - I'm in the middle of doing so. The documents to be completed run to several hundred pages with 21 Annexes to be completed. If anyone can swing an "old boys" deal through that bureaucracy they're bloody clever.

Marmora Man,


Yep I know very well how laborious the application and bidding process in public procurement is. (especially considering all the EU fuckery that has to be taken into account) But it didn?t stop the last government from having a go at strategic positioning and it won?t stop this one. The government may be bound by the procurement rules but a lot of the time they do set the agenda when it comes to what is being procured.

"There is one simple rule to getting government contracts - be the cheapest"


Is taht how EDS keep getting awarded contracts time and time again dispite fucking everything up, over and over again?


You'd have thought somebody would ahve spotted the pattern by now. Sometimes you have to spend a bit more to spend a bit less.

And clearly you don't read enough Private Eye MM, the likes of KPMG, earning billions off the government are packed with ex-ministers with current ministers ears.

Personally I'd happily have a decent civil service rather than spend ?570-?1500 a day on a surprisingly high level of fuckwittery from these companies. Especially when so much of that money is spent on all that nasty PPP PFI entanglement.


Oh yeah, the private sector is the answer to everything ;-P

Yep - they fall for it time and again. Standard EDS practice is to come in very low and then either renegotiate pretty much straight away or dump most of the contract into change control. Ker-ching.


Oh yeah, the private sector is the answer to everything


[Dons flame-proof suit] Actually, in a lot of cases - especially IT - it is. Most PS contracts, in my experience, that go off the rails are due to the some pretty ridiculous meddling and some horrendously badly thought-out requirements that don't in any way match what is actually needed, despite any advice to the contrary. Of course, there are complete cock-ups on the contractors side, but they usually end up in court. But there's a good reason why most of the IT disasters don't end up in court and it generally comes down to what is asked for (and contracted for) and what they actually want not being the same thing.


Also, there are a great many successful projects, but they never quite make it to Private Eye for some reason.

In some ways an old fashioned old boys bung would be preferable because at least you know who got it and why and it makes both the bunger and bungee clearly responsible if there is a cock up.


Not that I?m advocating that sort of behaviour mind but as anyone in the working world knows you open yourself up to a lot of personal liability if you vouch for someone. In some ways the trundling bureaucracy of the public procurement process can be used as a shield from that.

"there are a great many successful projects"


Indeed, I worked for two successful projects, both kept under 2 million quid, in a *gasps* quango*, doing good work for youth justice systems.

On the other side in PS (not that I wasn't a PS employee, but I was earning the queen's coin, you get my drift) I've worked for some shocking projects, particularly in banking, often throwing several million euros to no end, then rinse and repeat the exercise.


Our YJB (now MOJ) projects were mostly teams of individual contractors, expensive but skilled, in conjuction with decent civil servants. No expensive analysts from PWC, McKinsey, KPMG et al.


The higher profile sister project however went down the route of blue chip consultancy firm (not EDS this time but might as well have been) who just chucked as much resource (paid surprisingly badly despite their cost; some were good but most proved the peanuts-monkeys adage) at it as possible, to squeeze the gravy out of the train until the cost/delivery ratio tumbled and the whole project was canned leaving youth justice and the tax payer considerably poorer and said consultancy laughing all the way to the bank.


I'm not saying private sector can't do it, it just isn't a panacea by any stretch.


*said quango no longer exists in name, but in practice the same people are there doing the same thing at the same cost, but this time direct to the MOJ. So not sure what all the fuss was about in that infamous quango axe swinging.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...