Jump to content

Classic Mid century modern 1960s vintage Guy Rogers Three Piece Set - Sofa & 2 Chairs


Rags2

Recommended Posts

Classic Mid century 2960's vintage Guy Rogers Three Piece Set - Sofa & 2 Chairs


Original 1960?s Guy Rogers sofa & 2 chairs. This set is a lovely, high quality, comfortable 4 seat sofa and 2 comfy armchairs with a Danish look.


The generous proportions of the sofa could easily seat 5 and also make lounging/ lying down on the sofa a joy!


A classic example of British 1960s design, the frame is made from solid wood.


It was originally bought from Heals of London by my grandmother and has remained in her ?guest lounge? ever since. Has barely been used as my Nana wouldn?t let anyone into that room unless at a ?posh? function! The size of the Sofa is 239 cm (94 inches) long and the two chairs are 89 cm (35 inches) deep


The sofa structure and wood are in fantastic condition. Some of the webbing straps need to be replaced and the cushions can easily be reupholstered and recovered. A fairly straight forward job, but we sadly do not have the time or the space to keep it. But it is a very solid suite and a classic piece.


Buyer to collect and cash on collection only. Open to offers as would love to see this go to a good home.

These vintage pieces are well sought after so be quick!


I found this website which tells a bit of history about Guy Rogers furniture and also how amazing they can look when reupholstered:

https://habiibhome.com/blogs/news/154835335-what-a-guy


Message me to see more photos as not sure that I have done it right??!!



http://imgur.com/a/0LhTC


http://imgur.com/a/0LhTC

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...