Jump to content

Southwark Council offers 20% subsidised business rates for "talented lower income locals"


Recommended Posts

I doubt it was the council. The page you mention is at http://southwarkmagazine.com/news/8275/Occupiers-reach-for-Peckham-Levels. The mag. itself is a private one, unconnected with the council. The subsidisers appear to be the Peckham Levels project, http://www.peckhamlevels.org/about/, which was awarded to Make Shift Community Ltd, http://www.makeshift.org/. I see that Make Shift similarly offered a limited number of subsidised places in Brixton Pop, another of their temporary projects.


Peckham Levels Ltd is wholly owned by Make Shift Community Ltd. Make Shift has two active entities with significant control: (1) Mr Carl Turner (2) The Collective Partners LLP (which holds at least 75% of shares) The Collective Partners LLP has one active person with significant control: Mr Reza Mohammad Merchant. All according to Companies House.


Southwark is the landlord and enabler. Possibly that's all? Wherever it was advertised, they seem to have got the applicants: http://www.peckhamlevels.org/blog-1/2017/6/28/countdown-to-launch. There's a useful Southwark News summary too, at http://londonbulletin.co.uk/gentrification-of-peckham-continues-as-car-park-plans-reach-new-level-p2978-271.htm.


Remember when it was just the site of a Sunday morning boot sale?

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Ian - an interesting set of onion layers uncovered there.


I have a degree of confidence that HMRC can find its way through this and ensure the correct tax is being paid.



ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I doubt it was the council. The page you mention

> is at

> http://southwarkmagazine.com/news/8275/Occupiers-r

> each-for-Peckham-Levels. The mag. itself is a

> private one, unconnected with the council. The

> subsidisers appear to be the Peckham Levels

> project, http://www.peckhamlevels.org/about/,

> which was awarded to Make Shift Community Ltd,

> http://www.makeshift.org/. I see that Make Shift

> similarly offered a limited number of subsidised

> places in Brixton Pop, another of their temporary

> projects.

>

> Peckham Levels Ltd is wholly owned by Make Shift

> Community Ltd. Make Shift has two active entities

> with significant control: (1) Mr Carl Turner (2)

> The Collective Partners LLP (which holds at least

> 75% of shares) The Collective Partners LLP has

> one active person with significant control: Mr

> Reza Mohammad Merchant. All according to

> Companies House.

>

> Southwark is the landlord and enabler. Possibly

> that's all? Wherever it was advertised, they seem

> to have got the applicants:

> http://www.peckhamlevels.org/blog-1/2017/6/28/coun

> tdown-to-launch. There's a useful Southwark News

> summary too, at

> http://londonbulletin.co.uk/gentrification-of-peck

> ham-continues-as-car-park-plans-reach-new-level-p2

> 978-271.htm.

>

> Remember when it was just the site of a Sunday

> morning boot sale?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you are that bothered, why don't you ask the people at the mosque what the situation is, and let us all know? 🤣 I live round the corner and I hadn't even noticed an awning, let alone one "half hanging off". If you think it's a safety hazard, that's a different issue, and one they may not be aware of, in which case you should definitely let them know.
    • I guess, in a few weeks we will see if he is still a councillor or goes back to teaching 🤔 
    • What happened with the Heygate was absolutely scandalous. The lack of accountability is shocking.
    • Because the previous Libdem/Tory coalition council did so much better? ....Oh wait. Selling off the Heygate at a bargain price and reducing the number of council homes it replaced? Being in opposition is so much easier isn't it James.  The point on allowances etc is a valid one, and that is about finding the right balance between the responsibility of those cabinet roles and the role of service that should underpin all political aspirations in an ideal world. Holding down a full time job, while having to attend meetings and then deal with case work on top, is a huge ask imo. People in key roles need to have the time needed to do those roles effectively, so some renumeration makes sense. It's just a question of where the balance should be. McAsh has walked away from that, so his convictions are doing more talking than careerism arguably.  Worth pointing out that most MPs started out as party/ political activists/ campaigners on a local level. Different parties have different processes for selecting candidates, but everyone starts out at a low level. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...