Jump to content

Southwark Council offers 20% subsidised business rates for "talented lower income locals"


Recommended Posts

I doubt it was the council. The page you mention is at http://southwarkmagazine.com/news/8275/Occupiers-reach-for-Peckham-Levels. The mag. itself is a private one, unconnected with the council. The subsidisers appear to be the Peckham Levels project, http://www.peckhamlevels.org/about/, which was awarded to Make Shift Community Ltd, http://www.makeshift.org/. I see that Make Shift similarly offered a limited number of subsidised places in Brixton Pop, another of their temporary projects.


Peckham Levels Ltd is wholly owned by Make Shift Community Ltd. Make Shift has two active entities with significant control: (1) Mr Carl Turner (2) The Collective Partners LLP (which holds at least 75% of shares) The Collective Partners LLP has one active person with significant control: Mr Reza Mohammad Merchant. All according to Companies House.


Southwark is the landlord and enabler. Possibly that's all? Wherever it was advertised, they seem to have got the applicants: http://www.peckhamlevels.org/blog-1/2017/6/28/countdown-to-launch. There's a useful Southwark News summary too, at http://londonbulletin.co.uk/gentrification-of-peckham-continues-as-car-park-plans-reach-new-level-p2978-271.htm.


Remember when it was just the site of a Sunday morning boot sale?

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Ian - an interesting set of onion layers uncovered there.


I have a degree of confidence that HMRC can find its way through this and ensure the correct tax is being paid.



ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I doubt it was the council. The page you mention

> is at

> http://southwarkmagazine.com/news/8275/Occupiers-r

> each-for-Peckham-Levels. The mag. itself is a

> private one, unconnected with the council. The

> subsidisers appear to be the Peckham Levels

> project, http://www.peckhamlevels.org/about/,

> which was awarded to Make Shift Community Ltd,

> http://www.makeshift.org/. I see that Make Shift

> similarly offered a limited number of subsidised

> places in Brixton Pop, another of their temporary

> projects.

>

> Peckham Levels Ltd is wholly owned by Make Shift

> Community Ltd. Make Shift has two active entities

> with significant control: (1) Mr Carl Turner (2)

> The Collective Partners LLP (which holds at least

> 75% of shares) The Collective Partners LLP has

> one active person with significant control: Mr

> Reza Mohammad Merchant. All according to

> Companies House.

>

> Southwark is the landlord and enabler. Possibly

> that's all? Wherever it was advertised, they seem

> to have got the applicants:

> http://www.peckhamlevels.org/blog-1/2017/6/28/coun

> tdown-to-launch. There's a useful Southwark News

> summary too, at

> http://londonbulletin.co.uk/gentrification-of-peck

> ham-continues-as-car-park-plans-reach-new-level-p2

> 978-271.htm.

>

> Remember when it was just the site of a Sunday

> morning boot sale?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...