Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Spammers 'spoof' the from address (and/or the reply-to address) and quite often use your own address just to get around spam filters.


But filtering on the from address is pretty useless anyway, as they use all sorts of addresses. I often get spam from friends addresses, often because they have been hacked. If you are on Hotmail or Gmail or whatever, you are better off looking into turning on the inbuilt spam filter. These look at the message itself and the email metadata and try to make a better educated guess.

I've found Gmail is really good at blocking spam.


I have the opposite problem. It puts things into my spam folder which aren't spam and then deletes them after thirty days..


I only found this out recently :(


And when informed that they aren't spam, it continues to treat emails from that address as spam :(

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've found Gmail is really good at blocking spam.

>

> I have the opposite problem. It puts things into

> my spam folder which aren't spam and then deletes

> them after thirty days..

>

> I only found this out recently :(

>

> And when informed that they aren't spam, it

> continues to treat emails from that address as

> spam :(


Just ADD to Safe Senders list..


Foxy

This might not be related but there was a huge dump of emails and passwords recently - discovered a couple of weeks ago but likely stolen a while back. Have a check against your address on the HaveIBeenPwned site linked above. Apparently these addresses were particularly being used to send email via SMTP - this could be why you're seeing emails from yourself. May be worth changing your email password just in case.


https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/aug/30/spambot-leaks-700m-email-addresses-huge-data-breach-passwords

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I've found Gmail is really good at blocking

> spam.

> >

> > I have the opposite problem. It puts things

> into

> > my spam folder which aren't spam and then

> deletes

> > them after thirty days..

> >

> > I only found this out recently :(

> >

> > And when informed that they aren't spam, it

> > continues to treat emails from that address as

> > spam :(

>

> Just ADD to Safe Senders list..

>




Unfortunately it is messages sent via a contact form on our website, so I dont' think that solution would work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So that suggests the consultations with 'community' are just a tick box exercise where information given cannot be relied on. Not a good look. I hope Renata Hamvas who is the local councillor, as well as licensing, finds a way to stop the wholesale, spreadingmonetisation of an important green space in summer. If they get this it'll end up like Brockwell Park before you know it.
    • I’m broadly in agreement with you, Dogkennelhillbilly. But why the meme? It’s a very unfair representation of Sean Dyche, a man who to my knowledge has never engaged in any culture war bollocks. From his Wikipedia entry: Dyche features in an internet meme criticising modern trends in football, in which the phrase "utter woke nonsense" is attributed to him; he said "I wish I'd copyrighted it. Considering I didn’t actually say it, it does follow me around".
    • Whisky Macs, like Harvey's Bristol Cream and Cinzano Bianco & lemonade, are a taste of Christmas past sadly lost to many. A little Whisky Mac and icing sugar whisked through whipping cream makes a festive accompaniment to stollen or Christmas pudding.
    • Legal matters are notoriously slow.  There is no rule that communication has to be via email, fax or letter. If the issue is that you want to claim damages to the property because of poor practice, you would have to lodge a complaint with the ombudsman, but surely the one to suffer the most is the “gold digger” beneficiary?    If that is not the wrong that needs righting, what is? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...