Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ive had my Samsung tv for ten years now, recently it comes on for 10-20 seconds and then goes off saying

NO SIGNAL reading up on how long a LCD tv should last for it said 100,000 hours, Ive worked out my usage

and its 32,700 nowhere near the amount they reckon it should last for. Its annoying because the tv looks

like new and seems such a waste to just throw it out. I was wondering if anyone has had the same experience

and did you manage to fix it? and if so how? any advice would be greatly appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/167290-tv-gone-awol/
Share on other sites

It may be your antenna. Unlike old analogue TV's, digital channels either get a signal or don't - none of the old fuzzy, ghosted picture. And when it can't, it just says 'no signal'. It could be the recent storm has dislodged a wire or maybe something has chewed it somewhere along the way.

Rosetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lynne Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ours does "no signal" and it's the Freeview box

> > that's causing it

>

> That's what I was going to say, and why I asked if

> the OP had built in Freeview. The Freeview boxes

> don't last for ever.



This is so true. I've sadly just said goodbye to my Humax Freeview Box / PVR after 12 years.

> havn't found anything really apart from trying a re-tune which I have done


Did the retune report how many channels it was finding? From what you say, I'd assume close to none.


If that's the case, you don't have an aerial extension lead handy (or an indoor aerial) do you? If so, try plugging that, on its own, into the aerial socket, and see if you pick up anything with that. I've found that a metre long lead is quite good enough to pick up at least some of the Crystal Palace multiplexes. Success with that would suggest that something's got at your aerial connection.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...