Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ive had my Samsung tv for ten years now, recently it comes on for 10-20 seconds and then goes off saying

NO SIGNAL reading up on how long a LCD tv should last for it said 100,000 hours, Ive worked out my usage

and its 32,700 nowhere near the amount they reckon it should last for. Its annoying because the tv looks

like new and seems such a waste to just throw it out. I was wondering if anyone has had the same experience

and did you manage to fix it? and if so how? any advice would be greatly appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/167290-tv-gone-awol/
Share on other sites

It may be your antenna. Unlike old analogue TV's, digital channels either get a signal or don't - none of the old fuzzy, ghosted picture. And when it can't, it just says 'no signal'. It could be the recent storm has dislodged a wire or maybe something has chewed it somewhere along the way.

Rosetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lynne Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ours does "no signal" and it's the Freeview box

> > that's causing it

>

> That's what I was going to say, and why I asked if

> the OP had built in Freeview. The Freeview boxes

> don't last for ever.



This is so true. I've sadly just said goodbye to my Humax Freeview Box / PVR after 12 years.

> havn't found anything really apart from trying a re-tune which I have done


Did the retune report how many channels it was finding? From what you say, I'd assume close to none.


If that's the case, you don't have an aerial extension lead handy (or an indoor aerial) do you? If so, try plugging that, on its own, into the aerial socket, and see if you pick up anything with that. I've found that a metre long lead is quite good enough to pick up at least some of the Crystal Palace multiplexes. Success with that would suggest that something's got at your aerial connection.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...