Jump to content

Recommended Posts

NHS Reforms - some basic propositions for discussion:


Stop regarding the NHS, a system created 70 years ago to serve a very different country and population, as a sacred cow that cannot be changed, developed or improved.


1. Reduce bureaucracy and get rid of SHAs and PCTs - saving approximately ?10bn a year.


2. Hand over the decisions about what treatments are required, where they are carried out and when they are carried out to primary care professionals that meet patients every day.


NOTE: Additional management and transactions costs of 2. approximately ?5bn a year. Net saving from 1 & 2 = ?5bn a year.


3. Give most NHS managers a spinal stiffener to enable them to confront and weed out the lazy, incompetent and dangerous staff they all know are in the system.


4. Keep the NHS free at the point of delivery and tax funded - but allow top ups (for example to purchase drugs on trial and not yet NICE approved, or to move to a side rooms, or to purchase food from the restaurant across the road rather than suffer warmed up "cook/chill" slop).


5. Allow the primary care professionals to purchase care from whoever and wherever they find most effective, efficient, safe and price sensitive.


6. Support private healthcare - every person that is treated at their personal(or insurer's) cost represents money that doesn't have to be spent by the NHS - so its funding goes further toward treating those that cannot afford private healthcare. WARNING ANECDOTE: In Cambridge, with a large liberal left / academic population, approximately 12.5% of the population have private health insurance - much provided by the University to its lecturers and dons. Yet overall up to 50% of those insured do not use their insurance - preferring to quote "support their local NHS". This is very shortsighted thinking.


7. Politicians and government should treat the public like grown ups and not pretend, for the sake of votes, that it is possible to have a hospital on every street corner and a 24/7 GP service in every home.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16871-nhs-reforms/#findComment-429792
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...