Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is number of redundencies drawn up for Horniman,once again volunteers have taken another job away from someone.

Its a growing sneaky ploy that started in Dulwich park,they let the keen volunteers do work, and take a mans/womans

livlihood away.

The latest victim has worked at Hornimans for fifteen years,a fully qualified master gardener,now leaving the Gardens bereft of the only person with horticultural skill.and top City and Guild qaulifications.;.,

What angers me is this man,who was out on leave for an accident while working.was told by letter he was to be made

redundant,what a snide move.,then his told he has the lowest redundancy pay.

I think Hornimans treated him very shabily, his such a decent bloke too.

So whose safe at that place,no one.

Before you volunteer, think whose job you are putting in jepordy. Hornimans staff, The Swine.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/16920-horniman-gardens/
Share on other sites

I agree being told you're being made redundant in a letter is pretty poor.


But a lot of horticultural/parks staff are being made redundant at various councils due to council cuts - I doubt it's anything to do with the presence of the volunteers.


I went to the Rookery (at the top of Streatham Common) yesterday and was really disappointed to see the pretty garden with the rivulets and waterfalls returning to the weedy and neglected state it was in for a long time during the Tory regime in the eighties.


The gardens in Norwood Grove, just next to the Rookery, were in an even worse state of neglect. Different council apparently (Croydon rather than Lambeth).


So actually the volunteers may be doing us all a favour as without them the situation at the Horniman might be even worse.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No one is arguing that people should cycle without lights or reflectors. Obviously they should. It is also a legal requirement. But the colour of someone’s clothing? Is it ok to wear navy? What about green? What shade? At what point should we have ‘no reason for sympathy’ if they’re in a collision? I don’t want people to feel like they need special clothes just to walk or cycle. If you have lights and reflectors and you’re on well lit city streets, there is no reason why drivers shouldn’t be able to see you. But yes, if there are lots of people without lights, that should be addressed. I suspect in part, it's the change over in seasons and the fact that people are getting caught out by how early it's getting dark.
    • Found it but cannot contact owner as no email or message on it. e*****@icloud.com   please let me know if you’ve recently lost an Apple Watch SE
    • What a passionate thread this is. I have worked in cycling for years, am a cyclist, a driver, use public transport etc. Driving last night with my two young kids, who also cycle, we made the same observations. It was the kids who first asked me why are most cyclists wearing full black and no lights. We then played a game who can spot all the cyclists, and count those with lights and those without. This teaches them to look out for them but also not to put themselves in a position where we have to strain to find them. 
    • On the plus side showers are warm down - for now 😆
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...