Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks Alice - I was trying to remember details of work a friend had done in Sydenham . Is scaffolding needed if right on road for safety reasons /prorection of pedestrains on pavement ?
Not 100% sure but seem to remember being told by an installer working on our upstairs neighbours' windows that H&S regs mean it's not legal to try to fit a replacement window from the inside - in case it falls forward, obviously - and that it's not legal to use ladders any height above the first floor, so if you have second floor windows scaffolding would definitely be compulsory.
I'd be surprised if there is anything specific in the 'H&S regs'; safety law is rarely that prescriptive, it will depend upon the design of a safe working method for all persons involved. Workmen often say that they cannot do certain things because of H&S law but it's usually because their company safety officer has written a method statement that they have to follow. That said, scaffolding may be the only practical solution; will you need to repoint, or change a stone cill? You may find that having scaffolding reduces the numbers of workers required to make the process safe. The additional reason for scaffolding for windows next to the road would be to prevent even the smallest piece of debris hitting a pedestrian - they always forget to wear hard hats.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • beansprout, what other countries are you familiar with?
    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
    • Point is.. top two have quit.. BBC is now what? From being well respected world wide.. not only for news, programs, no idea about pod casts.. Only thing we as a country do well currently is broadcast remembrance service…. Lets face it.. only country that I know of who can release wrong people from jail.. one gave himself up if news is to believed and the other is where? Only country I know of who actually pay people to leave, flights etc and they are back in country .. all heard via Radio 4…  
    • It doesn't matter what channel it was on, how pernicious the subject is and when it happened. Mis-representing the truth in broadcast is not only morally wrong, it's against the OFCOM code of ethics.  Everyone in the industry is trained in how not to do it, most are made to take the BBC's own 'Safeguarding the Trust' course, even if they aren't making BBC programmes.  There wasn't much fuss at the time, because no one knew about it.  "Unless you hate Britain, hate liberals, hate the BBC, want a divided country, support the most powerful person in the world despite his many failings". What the programme makers personally think or feel should never affect how they tell a story; to do so is deeply unprofessional and a sackable offence.  It's the job of the BBC and of all programming to inform viewers of the facts and let them make up their own minds. Even in campaigning documentaries.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...