-
-
Latest Discussions
-
The Toronto is boring amused me. I was thinking of Philadelphia but when I reconsidered, Toronto seemed the obvious place. But my research came to your conclusion that it is in deed dull. I've been to Vancouver twice but found that surprisingly sterile too. I'll raise your Sydney with my San Fran and Wellington, both bay cities like Vancouver but I found far more cultural. Although that is obvious with San Fran. I've probably got myself banned from the US with this thread and my views on Trump posted elsewhere. In your suggested tour what about the towns and cities where the National Guard has been called. That would be fun. Kansas is apparently a great place but will be frighteningly hot I expect -
By David Peckham · Posted
Fifa are discussing expanding it to 64 teams for the 2030 tournament South America, which would mean 128 games. That's mad. They're aren't enough hours in the day to watch that much football and I'd have to move house to find a place with enough space for my 'Super Sun World Cup Wall Chart'. There are games in Mexico and Canada in 2026, so that's an option. Mexico will be unbearably hot, Toronto will be unbearably dull - Leonard Cohen once described it as 'New York run by the Swiss' and he was spot on - so I'd say Vancouver. Possibly the most beautiful setting for a city outside Sydney and a great food scene. Nick over the border and there are matches in Seattle as well. The Amtrak train down from Seattle to San Francisco, another WC venue, through Oregon is staggering - and they have an observation car with a bar! Portland and Eugene are worth a couple of nights as well. That part of northern California and the Pacific Northwest is the most un-Trumpy part of the US, so I wouldn't worry too much and Vancouver is surprisingly interesting, for Canada at least. You've actually made me think about making the trip again. -
Was chatting to my mates including Robert Jenrick in the Crompton Arms in Handsworth and this was an obvious one Robert come and have a chat, I once lived in Handsworth, you twit The track has improved further with age
-
The difficulty with all the national shame is that you are handing the world to the right wing populist parties ("The flag, love it or leave it"). You can look at many if not most of Europe for the damage their colonial conquests did to much of the world. For Britain we could equally look at partition and the impact on the Indian subcontinent, 10 million plus death and the bonkers situation with India and Pakistan now. Spain and Portugal went much further in wiping out much of the population of South America. i understand that Stalin was 10 million plus. We all know about the Third Reich, even then perhaps the allies could have done more. I am not questioning what you say, but sadly most are only concerned about the present and don't care about sins of the past. And back to my earlier comment that some will point out other 'conflicts' attracting much less interest. Not a reason not to march tomorrow
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.