Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Pope Benedict I?

Pope Benedict II?

Pope Benedict III?

Pope Benedict IV?

Pope Benedict V?

Pope Benedict VI?

Pope Benedict VII?

Pope Benedict VIII?

Pope Benedict IX?

Pope Benedict X?

Pope Benedict XI?

Pope Benedict XII?

Pope Benedict XIII?

Pope Benedict XIV?

Pope Benedict XV?

Pope Benedict XVI?


Damned if I know.

Should that of been:-


Pope Benedict 1?

Pope Benedict 2?

Pope Benedict 3?

Pope Benedict 4?

Pope Benedict 5?

Pope Benedict 6?

Pope Benedict 7?

Pope Benedict 8?

Pope Benedict 9?

Pope Benedict A?

Pope Benedict B?

Pope Benedict C?

Pope Benedict D?

Pope Benedict E?

Pope Benedict F?

Pope Benedict 10?

What about:-


Pope Benedict 1?

Pope Benedict 2?

Pope Benedict 3?

Pope Benedict 4?

Pope Benedict 5?

Pope Benedict 6?

Pope Benedict 7?

Pope Benedict 10?

Pope Benedict 11?

Pope Benedict 12?

Pope Benedict 13?

Pope Benedict 14?

Pope Benedict 15?

Pope Benedict 16?

Pope Benedict 17?

Pope Benedict 20?


or


Pope Benedict 0000 0001?

Pope Benedict 0000 0010?

Pope Benedict 0000 0011?

Pope Benedict 0000 0100?

Pope Benedict 0000 0101?

Pope Benedict 0000 0110?

Pope Benedict 0000 0111?

Pope Benedict 0000 1000?

Pope Benedict 0000 1001?

Pope Benedict 0000 1010?

Pope Benedict 0000 1011?

Pope Benedict 0000 1100?

Pope Benedict 0000 1101?

Pope Benedict 0000 1110?

Pope Benedict 0000 1111?

Pope Benedict 0001 0000?


Or is this just being very silly :-)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Pope Benedict 0001 0000?

>

> Or is this just being very silly :-)


Fibonacci Popes :

John

Paul

John Paul

Paul John Paul

John Paul Paul John Paul

Paul John Paul John Paul Paul John Paul

John Paul Paul John Paul Paul John Paul John Paul Paul John Paul

Paul John Paul John Paul Paul John Paul John Paul Paul John Paul Paul John Paul John Paul Paul John Paul


(continuing the precedence set by John Paul taking the combining the names of his two most recent predecessors)

Saint Mary

Mary

Saint Mary

Mary Sain Mary

Mary Saint Saint MaRY

Mary Mary Mary Mary Mary Mary Mary Mary.....

Were are you Paul is looking for you looking for you....

Paul John Paul John wait for Mary don't get mad She is coming

Please tell all your seans and you will be forgiven but please tell the truth.


REMEMBER


IN LIFE, THERE ARE ONLY TWO THINGS TO WORRY ABOUT

EITHER YOU ARE WELL OR YOU ARE SICK

IF YOU ARE WELL, THERE IS NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT,


BUT IF YOU ARE SICK, THERE ARE ONLY TWO THINGS

TO WORRY ABOUT,

EITHER YOU WILL GET WELL OR YOU WILL DIE

IF YOU GET WELL, THERE IS NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT,


BUT IF YOU DIE, THERE ARE ONLY TWO TO WORRY ABOUT,

EITHER YOU WILL GO TO HEAVEN OR HELL

IF YOU GO TO HEAVEN, THERE IS NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT,


AND IF YOU GO TO HELL, YOU WILL BE SO BUSY SHAKING HANDS

WITH ALL YOUR FRIENDS

YOU WON'T HAVE TIME TO WORRY !


OH ! I miss Laddy Muck were is he :(

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Should that of been:-

>

> Pope Benedict 1?

> Pope Benedict 2?

> Pope Benedict 3?

> Pope Benedict 4?

> Pope Benedict 5?

> Pope Benedict 6?



Should this have been 'should that have been" or " should that of been " ?

> Pope Benedict 7?

> Pope Benedict 8?

> Pope Benedict 9?

> Pope Benedict A?

> Pope Benedict B?

> Pope Benedict C?

> Pope Benedict D?

> Pope Benedict E?

> Pope Benedict F?

> Pope Benedict 10?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...