Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone


I would be very grateful if anyone has had any experience in this area.


We know from the Department of Education that it is possible to split the Early Years Education Grant between two providers.


We are both working parents (I work part-time because I have to financially). We send our children (twins) to a private nursery for 2 days per week and then took up pre-school places at a Southwark school for 3 mornings per week. We were completely open with both providers of this childcare about what we were doing and neither brought up the funding situation as an issue.


We have now been told, in May, after starting this provision in January 2011, that the grant will only be paid to 1 of the 2 providers and that the school will always come first. Therefore our nursery tell us that our monthly fees will go up by ?300 per month.


I believe that Southwark should fall in line with the DofE and enable split funding as this current system is not fair and does not suit anyone who works. We, as working parents, who are just trying to get by and make a living, are being penalized very heavily and are going to find it difficult to find an alternative solution because of our particular circumstances; we cannot come up with extra money just like that with no warning.


We feel that this is our grant for our children. Southwark tell us that because we were offered 5 mornings at pre-school, it is irrelevant that we only can use 3 mornings - the full grant still goes to the school.


Any help would be very welcome


Thanks

Did the school actually agree they would provide just 3x 3h sessions? Or did they offer you 5 and you used just 3? Few schools if any offer flexible provision you see


If you can prove that was the agreement with the school then the school should only be entitled to grant for the 3 sessions


How about contacting your councillor?

Did the school actually agree they would provide just 3x 3h sessions? Or did they offer you 5 and you used just 3? Few schools if any offer flexible provision you see


If you can prove that was the agreement with the school then the school should only be entitled to grant for the 3 sessions


How about contacting your councillor?

Thanks Fuschia

Yes, I did actually write to the school (well, to the head of early years) and tell them why we would not be able to use the 5 days, because of working requirements). the actually form i then received, just had the offer of 5 days and I then returned it completed, only accepting 3. I would have assumed that this was enough paperwork - especially as no one had indicated there was any kind of issue.


We intend to contact the councillor about this. I do appreciate your response. I now understand that that a blind eye is generally turned to this double funding because of the administrative issues but I would suggest that they either play it one way or the other - either they turn a blind eye or they do it properly and allow funding to go to the providers of the care, as the D of E suggests should be possible.


thanks again

I guess they interpreted it (wrongly, it turns out) as a 5 day place not used every day.

The funding arrangements for the grant were different fos schools last financial year and this.


In the LA where i work (and I guess others) in 2010/11 schools received a lump sum from a govt grant to fund the 15h. 2011/12 is the first year the funding forms part of the core budget and is based on a proper headcount. I don't know what flexibility there is but in my LA parents will now sign a funding agreement to confirm they are using their 15 in full at one provider (or not) and double funding should be eliminated.


I have looked around but can't see Southwark's procedure anywhere. You could put in a FOI request or your cllr could pursue it.


I think the school has jumped to a certain conclusion, but if you stated on the acceptance you were only accepting 3 sessions, you are in the right. (Though I suspect the school would then have withdrawn the offer as they can't afford to have the place empty and unfunded on 2 days)

Something for you


http://www.southwark.gov.uk/faqs/200016/childcare/answer/301/can_i_use_more_than_one_early_education_provider#a301


"W


Q: Can I use more than one early education provider?


Answer:

It is possible to split your place between two providers as long as the total number of free hours does not exceed your entitlement. However, this provision is only available if the early education provider is able to accomodate you in this way."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...