Jump to content

Recommended Posts

OK I'm not very religious but for those who are especially Catholics - can he ?


He says Satan leads us into temptation, not God, but Satan comes under Gods domain IMHO - they even had a friendly chat about Job once (I went to Sunday school for years which is why I have an interest).



https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/08/lead-us-not-into-mistranslation-pope-wants-lords-prayer-changed

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OK I'm not very religious but for those who are

> especially Catholics - can he ?

>

> He says Satan leads us into temptation, not God,

> but Satan comes under Gods domain IMHO - they even

> had a friendly chat about Job once (I went to

> Sunday school for years which is why I have an

> interest).

>

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/08/lead

> -us-not-into-mistranslation-pope-wants-lords-praye

> r-changed

According to the article the French are already using a different phrase- the French always do what they want anyway.

This world is in utter turmoil DUE to religion...any of which is about as true as fairies in the bottom of my garden- anyway the Norse stuff is much more fun

The homophobia that goes on in the catholic 'faith' schools is anti-so-called -Christian imho and the poor old tax payer of the UK helps perpetuate the rubbish by having to fund it. I went to Sunday school for years but fortunately my day school had some decent intelligent teachers who actually went out of their way to help us youngsters realise that religion is a pile of crap invented by old men to get control and power (much like politics really but the threat of hell fire and all that clap trap added another dimension of fear- although the extreme left use fear about when the revolution comes!!)

I'd have to disagree with the Pope.If God* created the universe and put us here, well he sure made it hard not to be tempted. Blaming it on old Nick* is akin to switching the light off and blaming the dark for being.....well,dark.


* Not saying I believe in the existence of either of these

I was taught at primary school that the meaning of "lead us not into temptation" was that one was asking God to lead us away from temptation, i.e. a translation/expansion would read "Lead us so that we can follow you away from temptation." Even as a small child I remember thinking it'd surely be a bit easier if God just abolished the old temptation in the first place...

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was taught at primary school that the meaning of

> "lead us not into temptation" was that one was

> asking God to lead us away from temptation, i.e. a

> translation/expansion would read "Lead us so that

> we can follow you away from temptation." Even as

> a small child I remember thinking it'd surely be a

> bit easier if God just abolished the old

> temptation in the first place...


But that would remove free will - which is apparently His gift to us. There is of course the argument that all things can only really exist in opposition. Without cold, how would you know warmth for example?


In terms of changing the prayer - my understanding is that the Pope can do what he likes. He's God's envoy on earth and as such has a hotline to Him upstairs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
    • Have you posted on Nextdoor? There's a big cat community on there. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...