Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well quite. They're also warning Iran not to intefere with the internal politics of Iraq. Hmm, a bit rich there.


On a wider point Turkey might want to consider negotiation at some point; until the politics are addressed that war will continue indefinitely, a war which neither side can win.


The British gov't and the IRA both worked this one out as early as the mid-late seventies, which is why negotiations were started tentatively as far back as that. Took along time to where we are today, but how much better is everyone for that?


In fact some quite high profile think-tank types in the US are quite sensibly proposing starting dialogue with Al-Qaeda. The rhetoric of the 'war on terror' serves nobody but the extremists, whether a neocon hawk or the really nasty elements of terrorist/insurgents. There are always moderates with political ends who hold the centre ground, and it is with these that you have to negotiate.

When you start dialogue with Al Quaeda, what are you going to offer them? Parliamentary seats in Algeria? An Islamic government in Malaysia?


The rhetoric in the 'war on terror' comes from both sides, and the last time I looked Al Quaeda were claiming they would only be satisfied when they have established a worldwide caliphate.


It's pretty well accepted that the Kurds are the largest 'nation' in the world without a counrty, and the Turks (as well as the Iraqis) have always refused to compromise with any kind of autonomy. I'm no fan of Bush but it makes sense to try and resolve regional conflicts which are capable of a political settlement. Al Quaeda hardly falls into that category

I think I was pretty explicit about the rhetoric coming from both sides.


What do you offer them? How about the taking measures with teeth against nasty autocratic regimes who routinely torture their own political prisoners. No coincidence that most of the attackers were Saudis. How about the possibility of real democracy in their countries, and perhaps not installing a bloody great military base in every country from Uzbekistan through to Saudi Arabia.


It's very easy to paint the 'other' as bloodthirsty fanatics who hate 'our' way of life from either side of the fence. They clearly exist but most will (and al qaeda's really a broad banner term for local struggles) have deliverable aims.


If Algeria became a democracy or Malaysia voted to be an islamic state (and remember we tacitly supported the Algerian Junta who persecuted a particularly brutal oppression after refusing to cede power to a democratically elected ialamic gov't) then perhaps these people would get parliamentary seats or an islamic gov't, and none of our business frankly if they did.

How arrogant is it of us to stand in their way?


There are many difficult issues need addressing, and there are no easy answers, but I refuse to see how a 500lb bomb on a wedding party, or a cluster bomb on a poor deprived neighbourhood does that more effectively than dialogue.

"measures with teeth" - we invade Saudi? Malaysia already is a democracy, with an Islamic party participating in elections. And how exactly did we tacitly support the Algerian Junta?


I am all in favour of encouraging democracy wherever possible, but you cannot ignore that the ideology of Al quaeda is explicitly driven by hatred of our way of life, and is wholly intolerant of all the values of a liberal democracy. In the long term the idea must be to detach this ideology from other conflicts, which is what I understand is being attemprted in Iraq. I don't see how dialogue with Al Quaeda itself is going to help

"measures with teeth" - we invade Saudi?

Not at all, but selling them electric cattle prods, that we have evidence are used in torturing prisoners, or shutting down investigations into corruption that result in selling them $40 billion worth of the most sophisticated weaponry in the world is hardly up there with taking action is it.


"Malaysia already is a democracy" Indeed it is, but if an Algeria happened there I've no doubt that we would do the same. Be conspicuous by our silence when we know what is going on, share intelligence and continue to cooperate, when condemnation would be the honourable thing. Exactly like our tacit support of Israel's million odd cluster bomblets raining down on Lebanon recently.


"but you cannot ignore that the ideology of Al quaeda is explicitly driven by hatred of our way of life, and is wholly intolerant of all the values of a liberal democracy". Maybe, maybe not. The thing is not to mistake rhetoric for reality. Or do you believe that Bush's express intention of his policies is to spread democracy?


"In the long term the idea must be to detach this ideology from other conflicts, which is what I understand is being attemprted in Iraq."

Exactly, that's what the proposals of dialogue are all about, about teasing out the rhetoric and addressing the local issues, seperately in places like Indonesia (where our support of Suharto's genocide wasn't even tacit, it was active!!). Every where another "al qaeda" atrocity occurs is not motivated by a desire for a global caliphate, but by disenfranchised people with real grievances. You police against it and talk behind the scenes.

The rhetoric of "we shall never negotiate" a la Thatcher is not only self-defeating, it's usually completely untrue!!


I've no doubt we'll be reading in the press in a couple of years time that we're already negotiating, leaving this entire argument pretty moot.


*edited for money amount, $40 wouldn't get anyone very far

If the West didn't back, or bring about, the abuse by often externally imposed leaders, of the citizens of many countries worldwide in order to control their resources to keep our economies afloat, I doubt anyone would listen to the likes of Al Quaeda in the first place.


Their hardship is directly related to our economic buoyancy.


If they lived in countries whose leaders and economic systems were not imposed on them by the West to the detriment of the majority of their people, do you really think they would hate us as much as they do?

I'm mostly referred to the post Afghanistan al qaeda, but even with your examples yes, yes and sort of. Just because we don't agree, and the methods are monstrous, doesn't mean the grievance is entirely baseless. You give three examples, but there are somewhere between 3 civilians an hour ('official' figures) and one every three minutes (lancet report) being killed in Iraq thanks to our policies.


These are obviously hugely emotive issues, but unless you want indefinite conflict you have to be prepared to lay the past to rest.


Witness McGuiness and Paisley working together, indeed McGuiness recently met up with representatives of the Sunni and Shia communities of Iraq to help them start of a framework of dialogue to help bring about an end to the sectarian strife there.

"If the West didn't back, or bring about, the abuse by often externally imposed leaders, of the citizens of many countries worldwide in order to control their resources to keep our economies afloat, I doubt anyone would listen to the likes of Al Quaeda in the first place.


Their hardship is directly related to our economic buoyancy.


If they lived in countries whose leaders and economic systems were not imposed on them by the West to the detriment of the majority of their people, do you really think they would hate us as much as they do?"


As has been pointed out, most of the 9/11 bombers were Saudi - hardly a country with a leadership imposed on them by the West. Indonesia? No. Pakistan? No. I could go on. As for ecomomic buoyancy, the whole of the Islamic world is far less important to the UK economy than the US, or the EU.

The Saudi dictatorship has it's own issues, but yes it is backed by the west despite its horrendous human rights record.


Ditto Pakistan and Indonesia.


What about Somalia. They were actually experiencing their first peace in decades, but because it was a muslim group who had driven out the US financed war lords and imposed law and order, the Americans paid the Ethiopians to go 'rescue' the country from the muslim 'extremists' and reinstall their own extremists.

"most of the 9/11 bombers were Saudi - hardly a country with a leadership imposed on them by the West"


Err, that's pretty much exactly what it is. It was a British protectorate after we helped the house of Saud overthrow the Ottomans. We signed the country over to his dynasty in 1926 an it's remained an autocratic monarchy since with a great deal of support from the West.

Indonesia? Yes again, Suharto was directly supported in his murderous campaigns to stamp his control on the country.

Pakistan? No you're right, but amazing how Musharaff turned from being a usurping pariah to our staunchest ally when he joined the war on terror.


My whole point is that the rhetoric of the war on terror only serves benefit the rhetoric of the enemy. Sideline it as the minority extremist radical (essentially marxist) ideology it is and it will burn out. Then you have to address the grievances of those who have taken up it's banner in this current climate, in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia (not while it's got oil), Iraq (although the Iraqis seem to be doing this for themselves, sometimes the enemy of your enemy is not the sort of friend you want) etc.

Damn, that's horrible, especially the bit where you hear the guy's actual words. I read a lot of stuff like this when I studied asylum law, but not from the US. When you actually hear what happens, and look at the country research that backs it all up, it is sickening.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
    • Exactly the same thing happened to me a few years back; they were after my Brompton. Luckily there were only 3 of them so I managed to get away and got a woman to call the police, then they backed off, but not after having hit me in the back of the head first. Police said next time just give them what they want, but I sure as hell wasn't just going to hand over my bike to them!
    • In case anyone is renovating or stripping out an old kitchen, I am looking for a base kitchen unit or carcass to house an oven for a temporary set up kitchen.   Also looking for a run of worktop at least 180 cm long if anyone is disposing of something like this, I would be happy to collect.   thanks   Mila
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...