-
-
Latest Discussions
-
By Earl Aelfheah · Posted
No one is arguing that people should cycle without lights or reflectors. Obviously they should. It is also a legal requirement. But the colour of someone’s clothing? Is it ok to wear navy? What about green? What shade? At what point should we have ‘no reason for sympathy’ if they’re in a collision? How many tone variations in their clothing before it’s ok to claim they’re ‘invisible’? I don’t want people to feel like you need special clothes just to walk or cycle. If you have lights and reflectors and you’re in well lit city streets, there is no reason why drivers shouldn’t be able to see you. -
Found it but cannot contact owner as no email or message on it. e*****@icloud.com please let me know if you’ve recently lost an Apple Watch SE -
What a passionate thread this is. I have worked in cycling for years, am a cyclist, a driver, use public transport etc. Driving last night with my two young kids, who also cycle, we made the same observations. It was the kids who first asked me why are most cyclists wearing full black and no lights. We then played a game who can spot all the cyclists, and count those with lights and those without. This teaches them to look out for them but also not to put themselves in a position where we have to strain to find them. -
On the plus side showers are warm down - for now 😆
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.