Jump to content

EDT Still no WiFi


bob

Recommended Posts

bob Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In the EDT last night thought I would catch up

> with some friends on Facebook No chance WiFi been

> down since before Christmas, any one know if the

> Bishop has WiFi.

> Bob S


I have spoken to the EDT staff about their Wi-Fi.

There seems to be some problem with their Business Wi-Fi and they need the Public Wi-Fi for their tills


They have another problem with their TV services which is why they could not show the New Years Eve celebrations

The Bongs and the Fireworks. Does not affect Sky.


Would be nice if they could get the fires working too. No fires for over a week.

Not much fun drinking Alcohol Free beer at ?7.00 a pint. (2 Bottles) sitting in the cold.



ETA The Bishop Used to have Wi-Fi. not been there for a while. It was a strange system you had to Subscribe to (Free)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Would be nice if they could get the fires working

> too. No fires for over a week.

> Not much fun drinking Alcohol Free beer at ?7.00 a

> pint. (2 Bottles) sitting in the cold.

>



I know it's a radical idea, but you could always use another pub which is warmer .....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Cheers, they could also publicise the filming there - Entertaining Mr Sloane in particular. That's Beryl Reed, a friend of my late uncle.
    • Have you seen there is now information on the two notice boards in Camberwell Old Cemetery about the history of the cemetery and who is buried there
    • Everyone’s Invited made for shocking reading and, your right, the story never seemed to gain much traction. The whole thing felt very shady. 
    • Unfortunately there are two ways of examining this, if we even had the figures. The first is simply to look at the revenues paid to the Council and see if the costs (in terms of setting it up and recovery from it, including administrative cost) are less than the revenues. This would be quite simple to do assuming we could agree the proper allocation of those costs. But additionally we have the amenity cost to those Southwark residents either (a) losing amenity value through e.g. disruption, and secondly losing amenity value by being excluded from parts of a public park for an extended period in summer. That is not a fiscal cost to the council and clearly they don't give a damn, but that would be the only way of judging whether this event was of overall net benefit to Southwark residents, the only people who the council should be 'working' for. Don't hold your breaths. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...