Jump to content

Nanny Share Herne Hill


ErinR

Recommended Posts

Our current nanny share is coming to an end on 1 March after three years and we need a new family to share our brilliant nanny, Catherine. Catherine works for us Monday to Thursday, 7:30 -6pm. While we need Catherine to do the school run from our house in Herne Hill (we have two girls) the share can be held at either house during school hours. Catherine is English, OFSTED registered, has her paediatric first aid certificate, is insured for our car and is amazing with babies and small children. She really is a Nanny Poppins.


Because we value Catherine so highly, we cross-subsidise the other family's share costs. You get cheaper childcare and dedicated, 1 on 1 care during school hours (8:20 - 3:30).


Ideally we'd like a share for a minimum of three days and the hours are flexible.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/180080-nanny-share-herne-hill/
Share on other sites

Hi Erin,


We are moving to Dulwich Village on the 8th March, when our children will be 1 and 4 years old. As we are moving at short notice we have not sorted out nursery provision for our eldest yet, so could do with some help during the day! Please can you let me know how much she would cost per hour? We would definitely need her for a minimum of 3 day, probably the full 4 days per week. We could also meet her next week - possibly Monday 29th January, if you/she is free?


Thanks


Charlie (07976957858)

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...