Jump to content

Recommended Posts

puzzled Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> of course, when your party was in control the sun

> shone every day and peckham rye became the elysian

> fields. funny how your brilliance resulted in a

> swing to labour that bucked the national trend big

> time and swept you from and your tory mates from

> power..... and returned tessa and hattie with big

> majorities too.


I know James can get a little party political at times, but in general he is a very big force for good around here.


That sort of tiresome political posturing, however, is just a cheap shot and not much use to anyone. And, AFAIK, you don't have the mitigation of actually being useful to the general community, puzzled.

James - funny how you like to give it, but change subject and clearly can't take it.


As a Southwark Cllr I cannot see how you can blame the other administration. On things such as this which are NOT political you should all be pulling together working for the good of the community, as it is us who suffer.

Speaking as a Labour supporter generally I have to agree with Loz here... James always seems like he has a genuine desire to help people and his availability here is really refreshing. I don't get to spend a lot of time on the forum so I probably haven't seen a lot of James's posts but I don't get the impression that he comes here to push his political agenda especially.

Quite rightly if I go of the thread topic or am overtly political the administrator reprimands me.

If you ever feel I have done this please do report me.


If the administration does something wrong I will say so. Equally when they do something right such as the food waste pilot I say so.


When the lib deems led Southwark council I said sorry several times when things went wrong. Equally I was proud when things went well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Seems a pretty dangerous position to me - apart from getting in the way of pedestrians trying to cross the road large vehicles heading south have to edge into the oncoming traffic lane to get past. I've got a normal-sized car and had to squeeze through a gap the other day.  
    • When a car is left damaged by the road-side it may be that the insurer is tasked with recovering the vehicle to assess it and (possibly) take it for repair. Only if it is in a dangerous position will the police recover it - which saves money for the tax-payer.  You may also have some recovery options with e.g. the AA (other organisations are available). Were the car to have been stolen or abandoned then it will take some time to sort this out, and again unless the vehicle is in a dangerous position the police won't be rushing to deal with that. Not sure who the 'they' are in this case.
    • I wouldn't like to speculate, Sue. Not my thing. Teddy Boy is your man on the ground for that sort of first-hand detail. It's six points for driving without insurance and six points for using a phone, so that's an automatic ban of at least six months. They're going to be practically uninsurable for a considerable period after that. So, nobody's hurt, a clearly crap driver is off the road for some time and the good burghers of SE22 get a lovely, shiny new post - probably paid for by the driver. Every cloud, and that. If only Franklins wasn't changing hands, Lordship Lane would be almost perfect.
    • Was the driver still with it when the police arrived?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...