Jump to content

Recommended Posts

unfortunately the council HAS to spend its roadworks allocation before the end of the financial year....the motto in the public sector is 'use it, or lose it'.....there will never be any joined up thinking because you are talking about politicians here and they are not really known for their common sense!

Hi bels123,

Apologies only just seen this.

The junction of East Dulwich Grove with Lordship Lane had a large gushing water leak. AS soon as I heard about this I reported this to Thames Water - the resident who alerted me had not been able to get through to them - and also asked that council highways team give the immediate area more salt. Great that hames Water then reacted so quickly to repair the leak but it did mean an emergency closure of the junction and diversion of those bus routes and many others. Sorry.

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why is there no coordination between parties so

> the other roadworks stop and make space for the

> diverted traffic?



Probably because the contractor would have to be paid for his resources to be stood idle. That would be a waste of money.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What's probably happened here is an assignment of Poundland's lease. This means that Tesco would purchase the remaining terms of Poundland's lease from Poundland. It could be contingent on the council approving the plans for the signage change and ATM. The landlord would be happy because then a stronger tenant moves into their space. Poundland gets a bit of cash in the form of a premium. Tesco gets a fully baked lease to take over.  Companies don't submit these plans unless it was going to happen. It takes time and money to draw up these plans, and if you review them you'll see the drawings of the frontage are clearly 29-35 Lordship Lane. Meaning someone had surveyed the space and drawn up plans based on the specific property. 
    • I have no agenda just a simple response expressing my thoughts and experience.  
    • Just as one example, the grass in a least some of  the tree pits in Ulverscroft Road appears to have been sprayed. If it's not the council who has done it, then I wonder if someone is trying to kill the trees 😭 although I doubt if that would work, as the council have sprayed tree pits in the past (ignoring handwritten notices by my then very young grandchildren asking them not to spray as they had sowed flower seeds there) 🤬 Grass in the pavement nearby appears to have been neither sprayed nor scraped out. I'm quite confused.
    • They aren't. They are removing them manually, scraping and cutting them out. I've seen them doing it on my road and surrounding roads. I can't imagine that they would have different methods in different parts of East Dulwich.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...