Jump to content

Recommended Posts

From reading the teachers' comments it doesn't sound like the whistleblowers wanted this to go public and maybe they did not even dream it would cause such a public rumpus. The exam board went to the newspapers, I suspect, to encourage others to come forward with information. My son used to go to Kingsdale and he really did love it, but I moved him to another school because some alarm bells rang with me about how certain things were done. I couldn't quite put my finger on what was wrong and a few parents thought I was nuts, but some things were just not transparent (a bit like their admissions policy). I have no doubts the school really is the amazing school it says it is, as my son hated his new school, but it does need this shake up to iron out some of its anomolies, painful though it may be. I expect many Kingsdale parents are now frantically agonising over what to do but I would just sit tight as this school will now come under a scrutiny like no other and the rubbish teachers will now have to leave or teach.

Curly - my experience of the education system over the last 2 decades is that it is dominated by league tables and a narrow definition of what counts as a succesful school ,ie one that achieves good exam results by whatever means .

My experience is that Headteachers and senior management put enormous pressure on teachers being expected for example to run booster classes at the weekend ,after school and in holidays for no extra pay .

Improved grades for some may be a result but there is a loss ( IME ) of real learning ,real education and very often for the average student , of confidence as they are constantly made to feel that their grades are not good enough .


The current system seeks to reduce education to a linear progression of targets that must be achieved - this is seen as good because it makes learning " measurable " and something which the teacher and insitution can be ranked and judged by .

There is no allowance for the many who don't learn in a neat and tidy linear way and the need to show that targets are always being achieved and that one school is better than its neighbour forces people to find ways that circumvent the system .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...