Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've started working from home a lot recently and have had quite a lot of special and recorded delivery mail to send and The Plough one is unfortunately my local.


I've never come across such a useless Post Office in my life before. They have 2 staff members who rarely work at the same time but when they do, they take their lunch hour together and close the Post Office between 1-2pm!


They are arguably the slowest Post Office workers in the country and even after queuing for 15 minutes refuse to take your special or recorded delivery letters after 16:45!


Infuriating!

I've never had a problem with them, other than some queuing times.


It's better that they don't take your special delivery after a cut off point if they can't guarantee to deliver it, IMHO.


Maybe mention it to them and see if they'll change their ways or just don't go there between 1 & 2pm, or after 16:45.

Most sub post offices in London and elsewhere close for lunch. When this post office was over the road by the Plough

Homecraft - it had one person only serving and had half day closing on Thursdays plus 1 hour every day. The same for the post office which was in CP Rd.

Ironically, perhaps, the 369 LL post office branch is listed as providing a Fast Drop counter service, though there is a 'latest drop off time' for these. And it does provide evidence of posting.


It's the signed-for-on-delivery stuff that seems the problem. It's hard work mining and refining seams of the PO and RM websites to see if there are quick posting routes for these. From "You can use your Franking Machine to send Recorded Signed For? items." (found here) you might think that was a possibility, though I'm now much inclined to think it isn't. Conceivably too, the Fast Drop service sounds as if it might be able to accommodate it, though I suspect it doesn't. Might be worth a quick check with PO or RM customer services though. At the same time you could also ask the PO CS about the fixed last-posting time for the signed-for stuff. I've not seen any mention on the websites about that, though presumably the branch want to be sure that all those items are in time for collection that day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I wonder whether his political epiphany and renaissance will stretch to him using his real name - James Ashworth-McLintock - rather than the more proletarian 'McAsh'. To my mind, the only people who should have self-bestowed mononyms are very talented Brazilian footballers - Pele, Kaka, Ronaldinho - very talented female pop icons - Madonna, Shakira, Sonia - or Russian revolutionaries - Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky. Sonia's greatest hits compilation, 'Greatest Hits', is out now on vinyl & CD through PWL Recordings.
    • Probably more helpful to ask simply whether McCash was affiliated with the Greens before becoming a Labour councillor. Trying to explain your thought process and unravel your fevered imagination (particularly when it comes to local politica) is the kind of thing that might require several years of psychoanalysis.
    • made the mistake of going to megans twice in DV.. would never make that mistake a 3rd time. Ditto I liked Romeo Jones a lot they did lovely soups and sandwiches and coffee too and such loveley staff.
    • Aren't most marxists radical by default...and he was a self proclaimed marxist on his twitter feed for years but deleted it as I suspect it did not sit well at Labour HQ. The big worry for Labour might be that he takes votes away from them (but not enough for him to win a seat) especially as there may be a significant protest vote against them at the national level as they are making such a pig's ear of things. I suspect though Labour are glad to see the back of him - to say he was a thorn in their side is an understatement and his loss of the leadership of the council was clearly part of the purge Labour has been embarking on to rid itself of some of the far-left lunatic fringe that have blighted them for so long. The Greens of course are willingly take any disaffected far-left Labour rejects in the same way Reform are hovvering up the lunatic elements of the Tories. The fact he went in with both barrels on Labour is hardly surprisingly but wonderfully hypocritical of someone who thought they were about to lead a Labour council. My how politicians flip-flop to suit their own personal agenda. How long before he falls out with the Greens...where to then? Why do I think he had an affiliation with the Greens before he became a Labour councillor? Or did I imagine that?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...