Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've started working from home a lot recently and have had quite a lot of special and recorded delivery mail to send and The Plough one is unfortunately my local.


I've never come across such a useless Post Office in my life before. They have 2 staff members who rarely work at the same time but when they do, they take their lunch hour together and close the Post Office between 1-2pm!


They are arguably the slowest Post Office workers in the country and even after queuing for 15 minutes refuse to take your special or recorded delivery letters after 16:45!


Infuriating!

I've never had a problem with them, other than some queuing times.


It's better that they don't take your special delivery after a cut off point if they can't guarantee to deliver it, IMHO.


Maybe mention it to them and see if they'll change their ways or just don't go there between 1 & 2pm, or after 16:45.

Most sub post offices in London and elsewhere close for lunch. When this post office was over the road by the Plough

Homecraft - it had one person only serving and had half day closing on Thursdays plus 1 hour every day. The same for the post office which was in CP Rd.

Ironically, perhaps, the 369 LL post office branch is listed as providing a Fast Drop counter service, though there is a 'latest drop off time' for these. And it does provide evidence of posting.


It's the signed-for-on-delivery stuff that seems the problem. It's hard work mining and refining seams of the PO and RM websites to see if there are quick posting routes for these. From "You can use your Franking Machine to send Recorded Signed For? items." (found here) you might think that was a possibility, though I'm now much inclined to think it isn't. Conceivably too, the Fast Drop service sounds as if it might be able to accommodate it, though I suspect it doesn't. Might be worth a quick check with PO or RM customer services though. At the same time you could also ask the PO CS about the fixed last-posting time for the signed-for stuff. I've not seen any mention on the websites about that, though presumably the branch want to be sure that all those items are in time for collection that day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • - had all the wrong connections at the wrong time - fraternised with some well dodgy blokes or rather one at least   - smart and  smooth talker - he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter - he is highly polished - skilled at making personal connections - never liked or trusted the chap, reminiscent of a slime ball
    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...