Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hubbie was casually planning to take our 9yr old to see the latest Harry Potter at the cinema when he noticed it was rated 12a (she has seen the others on DVD not at the cinema). Neither of us are comfortable taking her now we know this and she was mildly cross as many of her friends have seen it. What do others think about the rating and would you / have you ignored it?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18816-under-12s-seeing-harry-potter/
Share on other sites

My understanding is that children who are under 12 can see 12a rated films if accompanied by an adult. I would have taken my son if he was 9 - he is 6 now and actually isn't that interested in Harry Potter. But I took him to see the Green Latern which is rated PG 13 with another mum friend and her 6 year old boy and they enjoyed it (except for the kissing scences - wherby they both went 'yuck!' and hid their eyes) and suffered no ill consquences. I think these things are guidance and if you know your child and what they will and will not be affected by you can follow your own wisdom - if she isn't ready or would be scared you made the right decision for sure!

BBFC classification document here might help with your decision. All but one of the previous HP films was a 12a (if seen at the cinema) or 12 on DVD.


I suppose it all comes down to how emotionally mature your 9 year old is. Mine was very emotionally mature at 9 so he saw Part 1 and at 10 has now seen Part 2. It is also worth while looking at details of the classification to find out why it was rated 12A and then perhaps talking those issues through with your daughter before the film.


It was a great film!

Personally I think that all the films and books after no 4 are pretty dark. We both love the series and have been conjecturing on when our v little one will be ready for them. I think the original generation reading the books as they were published had an advantage, a 7 year old reading the first book would be ready as each year went past for a new book.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...