Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Loz , seriously do you not think you need your own thread - loz's of the beaten track dead end discussion thread.


Can I ask why you think that China, who are pretty advanced in terms of strategic thought as well as technology have built what can only be described as a pretty large wall around itself with regard to incoming and outgoing information traffic? Why don't you do the work and engage some thought then maybe your quotes will be less Pacman and more Paxman.


Lol


Back to the letter at hand, its bloody good but sadly the truth of it is somewhat lost in the irony. Personally I would have liked to have seen the audience of Question time slow hand clap them off the stage.

Can I ask why you think that China, who are pretty advanced in terms of strategic thought as well as technology have built what can only be described as a pretty large wall around itself with regard to incoming and outgoing information traffic?

MissNoodlesHats Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can I ask why you think that China, who are pretty advanced in terms of strategic thought as well as

> technology have built what can only be described as a pretty large wall around itself with regard

> to incoming and outgoing information traffic?


Ah, an attempt at a reverse Paxman. Good try, Allfornun, but sadly not effective this time.


China currently holds with the communist ideal of information control. They are especially worried about the information from western news streams, as the Beeb and the VOA, which carry information that the authorities deem to be not suitable for the populace. It is pretty obvious though, that as China opens up more and more to western trading and both business and leisure travel, this approach will be considered unsustainable in the longer term, as they will not only be forced to accept free flow of news and ideas (purely as it is virtually part and parcel of participation in a global market) but they will also discover that free speech is, in general, not a danger to effective government.


In other words, the question you ask is pretty irrelevant to your idea blogs have "effects of which are global and affecting (sic) change." as China is only one country (i.e. not global), blogs are a minor part of the target set of the Great Firewall of China and it is based on a paranoia rather than and actual power of the blog. Certainly a flow of ideas is a positive thing, and some grassroots ideas do make it to the big time, but if you are actually trying to say "The power of blogs is coming - tremble O Big Brother" then you are sadly mistaken.


Now if you had gone with Twitter and Facebook, you would have certainly had a case. But even then, they only generally have such power in single or a small number of unstable countries. Facebook campaigns in the UK no longer have any real effect and globally they've never really come off. Facebook is now just another marketing tool (notable by the easy way it is to 'like' something, but the 'unlike' is squirrelled away in a very hard to find place. You can't have all that advertising going unnoticed or turned off, now.)


Happy? We are a-wwayyyy off on a tangent from the OP, but for old time's sake, where is your proof that blogs have "effects of which are global and effecting change." (And I've even fixed your grammar.)

Er ? What an earth, where an earth have you gone here, I think you fighting with a figment or your imagination ?


I only said that blogs , a part of the information super highway effect change. To deny that is rather like saying I don't need air to breath? Its so obvious it does not warrant this discussion.


Arab spring ? Libya ? Paris hilton !!

Er ? What an earth, where an earth have you gone here, I think you fighting with a figment or your imagination or maybe fantasy who knows ?


I only mentioned that blogs , a part of the information super highway effect change. To deny that is rather like saying I don't need air to breathe? Its so obvious it does not warrant this discussion.


Arab spring ? Libya ? Paris hilton !!


YAWN

No community is rejoicing more in the return to relative peace following the riots than the residents of East Dulwich in south-east London. Like frightened citizens across the nation, they took to the internet at the height of the disturbances to exchange potentially lifesaving information. On the East Dulwich Forum website, one can still follow the frantic messages of last Tuesday evening. From user thebestnameshavegone at 6.18pm: "I'm expecting Ocado literally any minute ? does anyone know if they've been able to get through Rye Lane." Just over an hour later, Alex K posted. "This sort of thing just pushes further and further into the future any decision by Waitrose to open on Lordship Lane." Thank God it's over!


There you go, now people will change the way they thought of south london, no more hardened Richardsons and Frasiers. And also if that you sending me the somewhat bizarre and slightly off putting PM's do you mind stopping?

Great news!


Nike has raced ahead of rival Adidas in our Detox challenge!The sportswear giant has officially committing to


eliminate all hazardous chemicals across its entire supply chain and the entire life-cycle of its products by 2020. This is a major win to protect our planet?s water from pollution ?? so thank you for all your support.


Read about our latest success and Nike?s commitment to a toxic-free future.Thanks to your thousands of emails, blogs, comments, shares and tweets, plus some globally synchronised streaking: everything we?ve packed into just six weeks has helped make this latest win possible.


In less than two months,


we?ve exposed the links between top clothing brands and toxic water pollution in China, challenging the world's top two to take the lead in fixing the problem, industry wide.


Puma has moved, and now Nike. But the world needs more champions - so all eyes are now on Adidas. Help us celebrate this success by encouraging Adidas to also take the Detox challenge ? by


forwarding this email, sharing on


Facebook,


Twitter, Tumblr or your blog, and telling your mates over that post-work pint.


.....GreenPeace.......probably a few guardian readers amongst that lot, dreaming of utopia and wasting there time on the internet ?!

Just an example of blogs/forums affecting change. Here is another rather simple example which in turn has just made me realise about the ED ward councillors thread to, did not really need to go all the way to China.


"The residents group plus some users of the SouthEastforum, Nunhead section have raised this too. There have not been any suggestions to alter the current route from Nunhead Lane, by the Rye and up through Rye Lane."


Change to a bus route!

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

I like the letter but not its connotations.


You would do well to remember what else happened at the same time as the Politicians' expenses scandal was announced in the mainstream press. Something rather important called the European Elections. That the press chose to release the story at the time they did is what is significant, not the actions themslelves, even though the actions may be highly disheartening. Have you ever heard of a Kansas city shuffle?


We cannot allow ourselves to de-base ourselves in the same way, things may very well be bad and they may very well get worse but there is still hope.

If I remember, the expenses story was broken by the Telegraph - I find it very unlikely that the aggressively anti-Europe Telegraph would have launched this story to divert attention from Europe.


You're seeing conspiracies where they don't exist.


If anything the electorate is currently being swindled by the anti-Europe faction (mainly bigotted right wing geriatrics) who are trying to deliberately and disingenuously conflate problems with the single currency with the repatriation of human rights legislation.


Anyone who think's that pulling out of Europe now is going to do anything but create massive economic disaster is a complete f**king idiot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...