Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would you want to invest in a company with a 49m

> potential liability? I don't think any deal will

> be a good one for investors but instead it will be

> a case of people being willing to put their hand

> in their pocket to save a great club.


Would depend how much money I had and could afford to lose.

Small change compared to the alleged ?2 billion Abramovich has spent at Chelsea.

I don't make it personal - you just take everything I say to heart. I can't help it if you are insecure and can't take a bit of banter. Why is it Man U and Man C fans, and Spurs and Arsenal fans can mock each other and no one seems to get as offended as you??

Also, in response to your point on finances... Check the small print. You'll find Celtic are ?30m in the red. It might be in the red to their sugar daddy, but the loans are there. Would you say ?30m in the red is a good financial 'code of conduct'?


Parkdrive - no one is saying you should. I just wondered if you had a specific reason.

Consider this. Liverpool brought back Dalglish in the expectation of turning things around, to boost that ambition they spent huge amounts of money, a luxury they did not extend to Hodgson. Given all of that, had Hodgson done the same, can you imagine the grief and abuse he would have got. God alone knows what the EDFers would have said if the Arsenal had spent as much and we had performed like Liverpool. Yet nobody seems to think Dalglish isn't up to the job, another poor result yesterday. So much for the return of the king, more like the emperors new clothes.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Consider this. Liverpool brought back Dalglish in

> the expectation of turning things around, to boost

> that ambition they spent huge amounts of money, a

> luxury they did not extend to Hodgson. Given all

> of that, had Hodgson done the same, can you

> imagine the grief and abuse he would have got. God

> alone knows what the EDFers would have said if the

> Arsenal had spent as much and we had performed

> like Liverpool. Yet nobody seems to think

> Dalglish isn't up to the job, another poor result

> yesterday. So much for the return of the king,

> more like the emperors new clothes.


Liverpool record under Roy Hodgson


10 wins out of 20 got him the sack. ?20m spent.


Liverpool record under Dalglish


10 wins out of 27. ?100m spent.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Consider this. Liverpool brought back Dalglish

> in

> > the expectation of turning things around, to

> boost

> > that ambition they spent huge amounts of money,

> a

> > luxury they did not extend to Hodgson. Given

> all

> > of that, had Hodgson done the same, can you

> > imagine the grief and abuse he would have got.

> God

> > alone knows what the EDFers would have said if

> the

> > Arsenal had spent as much and we had performed

> > like Liverpool. Yet nobody seems to think

> > Dalglish isn't up to the job, another poor

> result

> > yesterday. So much for the return of the king,

> > more like the emperors new clothes.

>

> Liverpool record under Roy Hodgson

>

> 10 wins out of 20 got him the sack. ?20m spent.

>

> Liverpool record under Dalglish

>

> 10 wins out of 27. ?100m spent.



I rest my case.

I think the newish owners will stick with Kenny for the time being. It has been a pretty shit season so far, although FA Cup still a possibility), and I'm forced to admit that most of the new players haven't set the world on fire. I'll happily wait til the end of next season before making my judgement.


I agree, and said at the time, that Woy was very poorly treated, and deserved better from club and fans, but unfortunately for him, he was seen as Hicks and Gillett's man, so he was never going to get a fair run.

I would be interested as to how you arrived at that 80% figure Anna.

Was it from posts during the last week, month, 3 months etc?

If it includes posts made around the Suarez incident, then that would skew any 'statistical analysis'.

Do you perceive Otta's last post as 'slating' Liverpool?

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HMRC have said they are willing to do a deal.

> The big tax case findings are yet to be released

> so no one knows what the full liability could

> be.... and of that, HMRC will maybe deal at

> something like 10p in the pound.




Rangers' future has been secured. But only at the expense of a deal with HMRC over stadium naming rights. Ibrox is to be renamed the Inland Revenue Arena, or IRA for short. But please note this is only Provisional.


:)):))

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you lot realise that 80% of the posts on here

> are slating Liverpool.

>

> It's a shame you don't put as much effort in to

> backing your own team as you do slating ours.



I'm just questioning the dogs abuse Hodgson got when you consider the performance under Dalglish is poor and the the money he's spent far exceeds that spent by Hodgson. If that's slating, then guilty as charged.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would be interested as to how you arrived at

> that 80% figure Anna.

> Was it from posts during the last week, month, 3

> months etc?

> If it includes posts made around the Suarez

> incident, then that would skew any 'statistical

> analysis'.

> Do you perceive Otta's last post as 'slating'

> Liverpool?


Siege mentality.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you lot realise that 80% of the posts on here

> are slating Liverpool.



As this is from a scouser I expected a 'Thanks for giving me something to whine about'. There's just no pleasing you lot with your Beatles and your Brookside ferries

Anyone else think that Mancini was somewhat less than gracious with his recent remarks prior to United games? They would win against Spurs and that WBA was an easy game. I think it's very difficult to make assumptions like this in the EPL and his remarks were insulting to Spurs and Albion. Swansea I suppose was a very difficult game.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My understanding is the "free event" is 100% Gala, nothing to do with the council. Obviously Gala will still make money from the food & drink that they are trying to coerce punters into buying on their social media posts. Their costs will be negligible due to already having the infrastructure in place for Gala. So Gala are trying to appear community minded by providing this "free event", but the real goal is to set a precedent for a fourth day's festival - which surely no one could possibly object to?!? - in preparation for applying (again) for two three-day festivals spread over two weekends. It's only another two days, right, and the site & equipment is already there, so why would anyone object?!? More money for the council, much more money for Gala, win-win right? But yet another week of our park taken away from us, too, and another 18,000 people trampling & littering the park, and another week of disturbance for the native birds & wildlife...
    • Meson Don Felipe on The Cut was my go to place for many years. Though it's now many years since I was there. 10-15 minute walk from the Tate. If you go can you tell me what it's like nowadays?
    • Doubt you would have got much change out of £150.00 for battery and certainly having forked out for it, best to use your car. I recently sold  my car via webuyanycar.com - very pleasant experience & was roughly what I was expecting. Pop your bangers reg jnto their website to get an idea of price - they do send e mails once a fortnight/month just as an aid for you. Easy enough to delete - don’t even have to read valuation. They literally buy any car - if you can’t get it to them, they will charge you to get it there or recommend a co that will do it for you. Must say, mine was a 2014 reg and whilst a bit suspicious, paid extra to get money into my account as needed it for next car but was assured funds had I not gone down route I took would be in my account within 5 days. I now live in the country - every time I have been back to Dulwich and surrounding area, normally get a fine for driving at wrong time or parking at  wrong time so if I drive now, park in West or East Dulwich and do everything else by public transport and walking.  Were I still to be living in ED then before I left was pondering this very issue but since I have been back regularly for health reason I no longer drive but take the train and then buses, walk or Uber. Much cheaper than running a car and had I stayed, that would have been the course I would have taken. I don’t go out everyday, have an allotment or job to go to or family so in my case, would be cheaper not to have a car.  Was truely shocked   at the cost of second hand cars…..but where I now live only has a smattering of buses so no choice but to have wheels to get from A to B etc.          
    • If you don't use the car often then suggest disconnect the battery between use by undoing the earth (negative / minus sign) cable from the battery and the battery will then last longer between use. Remember, central locking, alarm, clock, etc won't work with battery disconnected and wit ours I have to lock the doors with central locking before disconnecting battery as only have key on one door (leave bonnet open before locking doors). Hope this helps  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...