Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would you want to invest in a company with a 49m

> potential liability? I don't think any deal will

> be a good one for investors but instead it will be

> a case of people being willing to put their hand

> in their pocket to save a great club.


Would depend how much money I had and could afford to lose.

Small change compared to the alleged ?2 billion Abramovich has spent at Chelsea.

I don't make it personal - you just take everything I say to heart. I can't help it if you are insecure and can't take a bit of banter. Why is it Man U and Man C fans, and Spurs and Arsenal fans can mock each other and no one seems to get as offended as you??

Also, in response to your point on finances... Check the small print. You'll find Celtic are ?30m in the red. It might be in the red to their sugar daddy, but the loans are there. Would you say ?30m in the red is a good financial 'code of conduct'?


Parkdrive - no one is saying you should. I just wondered if you had a specific reason.

Consider this. Liverpool brought back Dalglish in the expectation of turning things around, to boost that ambition they spent huge amounts of money, a luxury they did not extend to Hodgson. Given all of that, had Hodgson done the same, can you imagine the grief and abuse he would have got. God alone knows what the EDFers would have said if the Arsenal had spent as much and we had performed like Liverpool. Yet nobody seems to think Dalglish isn't up to the job, another poor result yesterday. So much for the return of the king, more like the emperors new clothes.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Consider this. Liverpool brought back Dalglish in

> the expectation of turning things around, to boost

> that ambition they spent huge amounts of money, a

> luxury they did not extend to Hodgson. Given all

> of that, had Hodgson done the same, can you

> imagine the grief and abuse he would have got. God

> alone knows what the EDFers would have said if the

> Arsenal had spent as much and we had performed

> like Liverpool. Yet nobody seems to think

> Dalglish isn't up to the job, another poor result

> yesterday. So much for the return of the king,

> more like the emperors new clothes.


Liverpool record under Roy Hodgson


10 wins out of 20 got him the sack. ?20m spent.


Liverpool record under Dalglish


10 wins out of 27. ?100m spent.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Consider this. Liverpool brought back Dalglish

> in

> > the expectation of turning things around, to

> boost

> > that ambition they spent huge amounts of money,

> a

> > luxury they did not extend to Hodgson. Given

> all

> > of that, had Hodgson done the same, can you

> > imagine the grief and abuse he would have got.

> God

> > alone knows what the EDFers would have said if

> the

> > Arsenal had spent as much and we had performed

> > like Liverpool. Yet nobody seems to think

> > Dalglish isn't up to the job, another poor

> result

> > yesterday. So much for the return of the king,

> > more like the emperors new clothes.

>

> Liverpool record under Roy Hodgson

>

> 10 wins out of 20 got him the sack. ?20m spent.

>

> Liverpool record under Dalglish

>

> 10 wins out of 27. ?100m spent.



I rest my case.

I think the newish owners will stick with Kenny for the time being. It has been a pretty shit season so far, although FA Cup still a possibility), and I'm forced to admit that most of the new players haven't set the world on fire. I'll happily wait til the end of next season before making my judgement.


I agree, and said at the time, that Woy was very poorly treated, and deserved better from club and fans, but unfortunately for him, he was seen as Hicks and Gillett's man, so he was never going to get a fair run.

I would be interested as to how you arrived at that 80% figure Anna.

Was it from posts during the last week, month, 3 months etc?

If it includes posts made around the Suarez incident, then that would skew any 'statistical analysis'.

Do you perceive Otta's last post as 'slating' Liverpool?

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HMRC have said they are willing to do a deal.

> The big tax case findings are yet to be released

> so no one knows what the full liability could

> be.... and of that, HMRC will maybe deal at

> something like 10p in the pound.




Rangers' future has been secured. But only at the expense of a deal with HMRC over stadium naming rights. Ibrox is to be renamed the Inland Revenue Arena, or IRA for short. But please note this is only Provisional.


:)):))

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you lot realise that 80% of the posts on here

> are slating Liverpool.

>

> It's a shame you don't put as much effort in to

> backing your own team as you do slating ours.



I'm just questioning the dogs abuse Hodgson got when you consider the performance under Dalglish is poor and the the money he's spent far exceeds that spent by Hodgson. If that's slating, then guilty as charged.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would be interested as to how you arrived at

> that 80% figure Anna.

> Was it from posts during the last week, month, 3

> months etc?

> If it includes posts made around the Suarez

> incident, then that would skew any 'statistical

> analysis'.

> Do you perceive Otta's last post as 'slating'

> Liverpool?


Siege mentality.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you lot realise that 80% of the posts on here

> are slating Liverpool.



As this is from a scouser I expected a 'Thanks for giving me something to whine about'. There's just no pleasing you lot with your Beatles and your Brookside ferries

Anyone else think that Mancini was somewhat less than gracious with his recent remarks prior to United games? They would win against Spurs and that WBA was an easy game. I think it's very difficult to make assumptions like this in the EPL and his remarks were insulting to Spurs and Albion. Swansea I suppose was a very difficult game.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...