Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Who saw that result coming?

John, Manchester's finest, producing some fancy ganache work in the final bake-off to pip Brendan the Softy Southerner.

''I'm over the moon'' said a delighted John. Predictably Brendan was ''gutted'' and quickly blamed a bad egg timer.

James, a distant third, headed home in true Scottish fashion with his tail well and truly between his legs...

Serbia need to be shown the door by Fifa and UEFA. They have a disgraceful track record as far as racism is concerned and last nights performance by Serbian fans, players and officials was sub human. Grow a pair Fifa and Uefa and boot them out of competions for at least a year. Well done norn iron for making multi millionaire and sour puss Ronaldo "unhappy", tool. At least they had a go unlike the Jocks who were played off the park. Shcoking.

ProPlus and sleeping tablets aside, another insipid and disjointed performance from Team England.

What gets me, is that in the post-match TV interview, Roy said that the pitch wasn't conducive to possession football, instead suiting the long ball game. If that's the case Roy, why didn't you play a team that included Carroll and wingers?..

" Shaun, a Liverpool supporter, on

5 live Your Call: "I've been 36

years a season ticket holder at

Anfield, but this is my last season.

I've been all over the world following

Liverpool, but I've just had enough.

It's too much. We have a ?140m

wage bill. If Liverpool cut their wage

bill by 10% they could afford to drop

the ticket prices ?15 per match per

person. But they won't do it.

"Without the fans there is no football,

and I think clubs need to remember

that. We are the golden goose. Don't

kill us off. I've got four children I'd

love to take to the match, but I can't

afford it."



Spot on that man.

Couple more comments from BBC website.


GET INVOLVED

Paul Wilkinson on Twitter: "If it costs

as much to see League 1 game as to

go to Cheltenham Festival something

is very wrong."


Peanut on Twitter: "Can't recall my

first match, was too young. Dad took

me home/away for years. My lad's

13, could only ever afford the odd

game."

I heard that call. Someone in the studio reckoned that the clubs could substantially lower tickets prices from the extra revenue they will receive next season from the new Sky deal, but we all know they won't. Fans go on about overpaid prima donnas, but to me the buck stops with the clubs, they control what the players earn, not the players...

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spuds 1 Chelsea 2

> Fulham 2 Villa 1

> Liverpool 3 Reading 1

> Man U 3 Stoke 0

> Swansea 1 Wigan 0

> West brom 1 - City 3

> West Ham 0 Southampton 4

> Norwich 0 Arsenal 3


Sunderland 2 Newcastle 1

QPR 1 Everton 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think that's a big assumption.  Many people vote for the candidate precisely because they are a member of a particular party and represent that party's policiies.  I personally didn't know who McAsh was in the last election, but I knew what party he represented.  When politicians don't act "morally" what are we to think of them and their motivations? But I think there will be people who want to vote Labour, don't know that McAsh has defected and accidentally vote Green precisely because they do vote for the name.  Yes, you could say they need to read the ballot paper more carefully but it's possible to see one thing and not notice another.
    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...