Jump to content

Recommended Posts

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Some people think the mail is just another paper

> with it's own slant on things, just like any other

> paper

>

> Those people are incorrect


So what is the motive of the DM then SJ, apart from selling papers?

It's CE, silverfox, not ACE.


It seems perfectly reasonable and sensible. AD is wrong anyhow, there's substantial evidence that this Jesus chap wasn't born in year zero.


I can't really believe that silverfox has even used the initials AD when writing a date in the last ten years.


If you rarely leave your front room aside from nipping out for a copy of the Mail, it probably doesn't really matter. However, in China (home to a quarter of the world's population) that calendar is frequently referred to as 'computer time'. AD is never used. Common Era would probably be easier for them to translate and understand. Anno Domini simply does not make sense for us Godless heathens.


Mind you, Mail readers probably think Chinese people should just shine shoes. Hence it probably makes sense to force them to use AD and keep hitting them until they agree?

It's crap.


Also, when is 'CE' supposed to run from and when will it end? will we still be in 'CE' in a million years time?


the Chinese, Muslims and Jews can have their own references - it doesn't offend me, why should it? eg, they can have as many lunar calendars as they wish and if it's their year of the pig, the year of the rat, the year of the Huguenot, good luck to them. It's better than having hundreds of thousands of year of the common era (again).

I don't think it's a question of everyone doing whatever they want - it's about finding a mutually comprehensible solution to ease communication and cooperation.


Clearly if you are by nature uncooperative, this may be low on your list of priorities.


Common Era, like Anno Domini, starts in theory from a completely arbitrary time in history loosely related to a supernatural figure still worshipped by delusional sects.


However, in practice it starts from the last time the date was arbitrarily changed, on the 24th February 1582. It created havoc, because delusional idiots thought the changing of the date stole 10 days from their lives.


I would have thought it's highly unlikely that Common Era with still be counted from then in a million years. Dates are an arbitrary political construct, and so year zero is often applied to dates that have cultural significance.


The French Revolution has a year zero in 1792, and Cambodia has a year zero in 1975.

Just to reinforce poor strafer's point that the 'news' story was an editorial clarification by the beeb giving programme makers free reign to use whatever they want, nothing is being banned.


Back on the daft discussion I have to say I'm no fan of CE BCE, as it is rather meaningless in a sort of denying the origins of our calendar sort of way.

Having said that Anno Domini is pretty absurd too (so is the use of Ad Hominem rather than personal but that's another bugbear of mine), but I don't suppose most people saying AD know what it means.


Thinking about it, use of BC or AD (or whatever) is pretty much limited to clarifying stuff about ancient history anyway, noone would say I was born in 1968 AD would they, so really this is a lot of fuss about nothing, affecting a couple of BBC 4 programme makers which nobody (bar me apparently judging by the threats to the channel) watches anyway.


As usual I have no idea what Silverfox is blithering on about. Dinosaurs?! I thought they were a cosmic joke to make scientists believe in the ridiculous theory of evolution anyway ;-P

The point about dinosaurs dear MP is that they can be said to have been in an era - the age of the dinosaurs etc.


an era has a starting point and an end. what is plainly absurd about 'CE' is it can't be defined, as Huguenot has demonstrated.


Ergo, Anno Domini makes more sense (to labour the Latin) as it can be used indefinitely whereas the common era has to come to an end.


This is the problem with PC, its adherents are idiots.

I've been approached a number of times by people requesting to start the calendar from my own birth, but I've turned them down gracefully.


My laptop seems to think the world started in 1905. It doesn't really do dates prior to that. I would have thought Boxing Day 1791 would have been a more logical choice.


I'm wondering what sort of significant date in the future could precipitate another year zero to be generally accepted. Interstellar travel perhaps?

So the dinosaurs was the common era, right, and that was their word for it was it?


All time is indefinite, as huguenot tried to say, any definition is an arbitrary thing.

plus, this may be the 2017*th year of your lord, but he ain't no lord if mine.


*I think it's commonly thought he was born in 6 bc.

in fact looking at this chronology, Luke has Mary pregnant for about 10 years!! So perhaps just a meaningless arbitrary name is better than AD BC when they are so wrong at describing what they are!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_Jesus

It seems to me that AD is religious and CE is secular. It comes as no surprise that religious people don't see why everybody can't be religious too, so long as it's their religion.


AD, as with many dating systems, was created to synchronise with other existing dating systems, as does CE.


It does seem a bit colonial to go around claiming that time is defined by 'our Lord'. The fact that AD coincides with the dating system used by the Common Era seems a most inclusive approach that should be celebrated rather than God botherers claiming they have a monopoly.


Silverfox, go ahead and use AD as you wish, but don't expect me to worship your Gods, or in fact have any respect for them at all.


Interestingly enough, years previous to 525 CE are completely fictitious, as the system wasn't devised until then.

It seems to me that AD is religious and CE is secular. It comes as no surprise that religious people don't see why everybody can't be religious too, so long as it's their religion.


I think you're loading this insignificant discussion with too great a weight. While I recognise this is a silly story with no real content and that there is no intention to impose change to the traditional / historic use of language, it still seems unnecessary for anyone to even suggest a change - language will evolve naturally over time if it needs to.


As I see it AD / BC lost any religious significance many centuries ago, and became instead simply convenient shorthand for differentiating before and after what you, correctly, describe as an arbitrary point in time. I don't see AD / BC as an imposition of religious intent or observance. However, if you do then surely any alternative useage carries similar (if opposite & secular) connotation?


As an atheist I can appreciate the language of the King James bible, or the words and music of hymns - doesn't mean I subscribe to, or feel I have imposed upon me, any religious pressure. I don't feel any need to reject these, or seek alternative words and phrases, because I prefer a secular society

Absolutely, it is evolving over time - to CE.


I'm afraid that the majority of the world don't worship this God, have no wish to offer him dominion over them, and don't use the term AD.


Time is a secular, universal and mathematical - certainly not religious concept.


'Owning' the calendar was a smart bit of marketing designed to push God. Having a whinge about the passing of this fad is the same as whinging about the demise of cigarette advertising on F1 cars.


Religion is transitory, fragmented and political concept. We have seconds, not archangels. Why should our years be defined by God?

Why should our years be defined by God?


But if CE means the same as AD, isn't that still conforming to the basic religious aspect of the measurement. You are still basing it on the year, accepted by Christianity, of Jesus' birth.


You aren't stopping the years being 'defined by God', just obfuscating it.

Not obfuscating it, just severing the connection.


AD traces it's lineage back to Roman calendars based on the term of office of consuls - by renaming it Anno Domini instead of Anno Diocletiani it severed the connection.


Common Era defines years by a 'commonality' - a collaborative act of convenience that reflects the most popular existing calendars of the day, predominantly Gregorian.


But as I said, dates are an act of politics. I'd prefer mine to be defined by compromise, rather than a supernatural deity. That may be a technicality, but it's an important one.

Bloody hell - it's the God squad again! They can't keep their hands off.


I understand that CE was interchangeable with Vulgar Era (Where 'vulgar' meant everyday, or 'common') so 'Christian' Era is most definitely a property grab by religious groups.

Does this mean that when I hit my thumb with a hammer I can still shout "Jesus Fucking Christ!" or should I be reverting to "By Toutatis/Belenos/Iovantucarus!" or is there a suitably atheistic equivalent?


I think I shall still use the ac/dc bc/ad way if only so that when explaining it to the young atheists of the future and watching their jaws hit the floor in disbelief I can say "I know! Mad isn't it?"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And now we have the worst labour government in many many decades who by moving to your position on the right are ushering in a far right reform government. Well done you.
    • You implied he did a good job in your first paragraph when you said you would have hated to see Corbyn lead the country through Covid - the alternative being Johnson, presumably? With the results we all saw. Unite - you have a problem with unions? Who work hard to see that their members get a fair deal in their workplace? How exactly are these people and groups "all as bad as each other"? In what way? Labour "purging their party of the far-left" has given us a weak prime minister who has apparently deserted any "left" (aka caring for other people and having decent moral principles) leanings he ever had. Which is why people appear to be leaving Labour in droves and voting, or intending to vote, Green or Lib Dem or for an independent Left candidate. Starmer has shot himself in the foot, in my opinion. But what would I know. What worked?! I don't know enough about what you are talking about to comment, but "believing" you know the reason someone did something does not make it true. I don't believe that Corbyn ever got "starstruck" or "forgot about his politics", but if you can provide evidence that those things are true, then fair enough. I don't think you can, though.
    • I think you need to get a grip If it's who I am thinking of, she's a young black girl in her twenties, has braids with bright colours through them and - I suspect - works with her father. It's always the same man behind the wheel and he's older than her, always in the same van, so I'm assuming it's a father-daughter combo which, if it is, I think is rather sweet.  They hustle hard in a job that is poorly paid, has little prospects, is relentless and thankless. The fact that they have stuck it out since the pandemic says a lot about them.  I think she's a lovely girl, who's perhaps a little shy - but she'll smile or chat back if you make the effort with her. And I admire her for sticking with that job for so long. Perhaps she's just one of these people who's naturally a bit clumsy or bashes things, the same way some people are heavy on their feet when they walk. But I wouldn't dream of jeopardising her job because she closes the slams the gate and doesn't 'kiss' the ring doorbell with her fingers.  Perhaps she's being passive aggressive because you are. And perhaps she also wishes she got to spend her time worrying about potential damage to her letterbox or her gate.  As for your gate / letterbox - you're talking about hypotheticals. Has there been any damage? No. Then go and live your life and worry about it when it happens.  (apols we have the wrong person, but some of my points still stand). 
    • Greg did an amazing job! He built a cabinet in my living room and added shelving. A lovely guy and perfectionist who goes the extra mile. He really understands what you want and comes up with various options to meet your price range. Would highly recommend!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...