Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ha ha. I suspect that John's irrational behaviour stems from the (somewhat Yorkshire) conviction that 'art' is 'rubbish'.


I don't see why he should see the books. It's none of his business. Who appointed him to be social auditor?


John, mate, if you truly think that an empty parking lot is preferable to hundreds of people having a good time, then 'curmudgeon' is an inadequate word. Get thee back to your dusty shelves ;-)

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> John, mate, if you truly think that an empty

> parking lot is preferable to hundreds of people

> having a good time, then 'curmudgeon' is an

> inadequate word. Get thee back to your dusty

> shelves ;-)


Curmudgeon is right! It's wonderful to see people being imaginative and creative, and enriching our community - Bold Tendencies has been a revelation.

  • 2 weeks later...

WhatsMyName Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Which junk-yard are you talking about John K? I

> thought this thread was about Bold Tendencies -

> which is all about art, energy, youth, community,

> vigour, innovation, renewal. Or is that what you

> mean by junk?


That's funny, because I fail to see how spinning shopping trolley handles is art. Energy? Place was dead when I went there to see what this middle class invasion was all about. Community? Now you are really taking the mick. In your efforts to promote "community", you managed to alienate everyone local - not just with your patronising art gallery but with the thumping "music" you decided to impose on people living in the area. I came close to calling the police on one of the nights. You have no connection to the community here, you're just a bunch of middle class twats wanting to look all modern by going to the sort of area mummy and daddy warned you about.


The local community doesn't want you here, take your art somewhere else.

love franks love bold tendencies. livens up the area. dont know what your going on about loud music - a throng of happy people maybe??!!


would love morre things like this to happen - and continue into the winter. a few heater sup there and i'd go up all year round - fireworls at NYE would be great from up here too


keep it up i say

arsmith Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> love franks love bold tendencies. livens up the

> area. dont know what your going on about loud

> music - a throng of happy people maybe??!!

>

> would love morre things like this to happen - and

> continue into the winter. a few heater sup there

> and i'd go up all year round - fireworls at NYE

> would be great from up here too

>

> keep it up i say



No of course you wouldn't know about the loud music you inconsiderate twat, you don't live around here. It just went on and on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...