Jump to content

FREE for all SEMINAR!!! 23 September 2011 at the University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom


Recommended Posts

The University of Greenwich?s Business School is holding a free seminar on the subject of multi-role networks on Friday, September 23.

Called Network volatility and advantage in Banking, the seminar takes place in Queen Anne Court, Greenwich Campus, from 1.30pm to 3pm. It is free to attend and staff, students and the public are welcome.

The main presenter is Professor Ron Burt, of University of Chicago Booth, USA, who has made world-leading contributions to the study of social networks and how this creates competitive advantage in careers, organizations, and markets.

The university?s Business School is a centre of excellence in governance, risk, innovation and accountability. The Business School has more than 4,500 students and around 250 full and part-time academic staff, while the latter are supported by a range of business executives from Canary Wharf and the City, who run a programme of guest lectures.

For more details about the event, and to secure a place by booking online, go to www.gre.ac.uk/enterprise/business-events/events/current/network-related-personality-and-the-agency-question

Alternatively, contact the Business School Events team on 020 8331 9083 or at [email protected]

To find out more about other events being run by the Business School, go to www.gre.ac.uk/business-events or follow @busevents on Twitter, and LinkedIn ? BusinessScoolEvents University of Greenwich.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's called The Restorative Place. Also, the Fired Earth storefront is under offer too, apparently. How exciting...!
    • Perhaps the view is that there are fewer people needing social housing in London, going forward, or to cap it as it is rather than increasing it. We already see the demographic changing.
    • But actually, replacing council housing, or more accurately adding to housing stock and doing so via expanding council estates was precisely what we should have been doing, financed by selling off old housing stock. As the population grows adding to housing built by councils is surely the right thing to do, and financing it through sales is a good model, it's the one commercial house builders follow for instance. In the end the issue is about having the right volumes of the appropriate sort of housing to meet national needs. Thatcher stopped that by forbidding councils to use sales revenues to increase housing stock. That was the error. 
    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...