Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Southwark Council has said it's carrying out a borough-wide public consultation into whether residents want a long term policy that will mean the parks get turned into burial grounds - or not. Understand that a quesionnaire was supposed to be sent to households in the borough. Has anyone had one?


The Council gets a lot of short term income from turning parks into cemeteries. And a huge long term maintenance bill. But it doesn't have to offer land for burial plots at all. It could save the parks. The only duty is to provide cremation.


They've been eating away at Honor Oak Rec since 1991 - the last time they took a chunk they said it would last for 50 years, but they've come back again after just 9 years to take what's left of the park. When they took the last chunk, they were asked if they were thinking about taking other parks, and one of the senior managers said that Peckham Rye could be used.


First they came for Honor Oak Rec....

i filled out the petition online against the Honor Oak plan - it was on both Lewisham and Southwark council sites but I never saw it come through the door.


the problem with councils providing burial space is that it means no space then for the living to exercise and enjoy greenery. (outside of cemeteries!)


Look at a map and it's amazing how much space in a very small radius goes to Camberwell Old Cemetery, Camberwell New Cemetery, Nunhead Cemetery, Honor Oak, Ladywell and I'm probably forgetting others. Together they must be larger than all of the parks in the same area.

But it is worth recalling that the land was originally purchased and planned as a burial ground - it only became a recreation ground for the interim until demand required its use. In some ways an excellent example of long term planning on the part of the council back in the 50s (or perhaps earlier/later?).

Mick Mac - sure things have changed - but death remains inevitable and while fewer people are being buried demand remains high and I see no reason why land purchased for that purpose shouldn't be used for that purpose.


Personally I'm going to be burnt with the waste disposed of at sea.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...