Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi I'm a Councillor up North in Warrington and I'm just wondering - what methods do people in East Dulwich prefer to use to contact their Councillor.


Do you prefer this discussion forums like this, telephone, email, facebook, twitter, letter, blogg, web sites, surgery, home visits, Skype or others.


I am currently running a survey on Warrington Worldwide online magazine which you can vote on Comms Survey if you join the forum from the main page Warrington Worldwide the forum tab is down on the left.


Or you can just leave your comments on this thread.


Thanks Cllr Geoff Settle

Once I have met the councillor in person, at a community council meeting for example, I then email them any queries, concerns or information I have, and I also hope to meet them at Police Ward Panels. So email is preferable if I learn from having met them that they are the sort of councillor who does respond to email. In desperation I sometimes write an actual letter on paper and stick it in one of those old fashioned envelope contraptions and drop it in to the Members Room at the council offices. That hasn't happened for a while. Email is preferable.

Agree with Alan Medic.

Also, for those who are more motivated to contact the councillor more often, this forum must save a lot of time as questions asked and answered publicly, are less likely to be duplicated.

I also much prefer the accountability of open discussion.

Email/letters for matters of a more individual nature. Never telephones - always best to have a record of what was said.

Kind of agree with all of the above.


One thing I would say, is that if you go for forum contact, please try to make it apolitical. A lot of goodwill is generated by going online and making yourself available, and helps people who probably wouldn't get round to asking otherwise. Don't squander the goodwill by also using the forum to slag off your political opponents the whole time (use a different log in for that if you like).


Warrington eh? I believe

owns the whole town these days...

Only if Cllr. Roy Smith is included...


WARRINGTON Borough Council has been criticised by a woman who wants a ban on the sale of foie gras the food delicacy produced by force feeding ducks and geese to enlarge their liver.

Ms Janet Thornton asked the council what it was doing to discourage or prohibit the sale of foie gras in the borough under the provision which enables members of the public to ask questions at council meetings.

She asked what the council was doing to discourage the sale of foie gras in the borough or to ban the serving of the product at any council event, or event over which the council had control.

Ms Thornton pointed out that some other councils, including York and Bolton, had already taken action to ban foie gras at council functions.

She asked if the chief executive could write to Ben Bradshaw, Minister of State responsible for animal welfare, asking him to ban the sale of foie gras in the UK and asking him to lobby for the production and sale of foie gras to be banned throughout the European Union.

Coun Roy Smith executive member for Community Services, said it was a difficult ethical issue as foie gras was a legal product, provided it met food safety standards. He could not see how the council could ban it.

It would be Quixotic to ban it at the Town Hall because it was never served at the Town Hall anyway.


Foie Gras and a Cervantes ref. - sounds like ED needs him.



ETA: - source - Warrington-Worldwide Online Daily Newspaper 21/12/2007

  • 4 weeks later...

I am lucky as I know all my ward councillors - I have emailed them, spoken to them in their surgeries/community council meetings/in the local streets, generally would not telephone them. I get very surprised when local people have no idea who their councillors are!


James is an exception to the norm by building up an 'on line surgery' I do not know how he makes time for it all with his council duties, full time work and a young family.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • To be fair, a pot of tea for one in a department store is a small pot, and you only get one cup or mug!
    • I know - we have been here lots of times since it first opened,  which is why we were disappointed that it was closed at a time it was supposed to be open, but with no notice to say why! I guess we will just  have to ask the reason at our next visit, but I'm not sure we will risk Saturday lunchtime again unless we find the closure  was an unavoidable one off ....
    • Nope. I don’t have this wrong. I’ve tried to put my point across respectfully, without resorting to personal, angry insults. And all my colleagues agree that the BBC got this right in its condemnation.    All you see is confirmation bias.    If you don’t realise that, then you’re part of the problem.    
    • We have always gone during the week at lunch time - great place and good value. Husband has been several times on his own and owner knows his first name. I could not go one time for some reason and she sent him home with some spring rolls (free)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...