Jump to content

Recommended Posts

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

---------------------------

> I'm engaged in an email exchange and sometimes

> receive emails with each line preceeded by > .

>

> I'm puzzeled by this .Can some kind person explain

> why it happens ?


In my world it's an indicator of quoting, just as immediately above; the number of > signs showing the level of nesting of quotation. For more detail see eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Quoted_line_prefix, starting at "Quoted line prefix".


If your correspondent hasn't prefixed it with an attribution line, possibly they've done a copy and paste from somewhere.

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thank you ,makes a bit more sense to me now !

>

> Any advice on how to target my tapping on my new

> Amazon Fire ? Or is it designed for young people

> with slender fingers ? Should I get one of those

> little stick/pencil type things I've seen ?



I don't have a tablet, but I used to use one of those stick things on my mobile until my daughter unkindly laughed at me.


I found that once I got used to it, using my ancient huge fingers on the tiny keyboard was actually quite easy :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What do you base those statements on?
    • I suppose I'd assume that Councillor McCash, who is, as I recall, a self-confessed revolutionary Marxist, had hoped to take Southwark Labour down his chosen route - when he lost his leadership bid he must then have been looking for a party which shared his ultra-left views (ultra-left at least in the light of Starmer's interpretation of socialism). The Greens, for him, clearly fit that role. After that his timing was all about benefiting his chosen (new) party - at least he didn't stand for Labour and then defect giving the Greens an unexpected 3 year seat. As someone who doesn't share the wings of his political position I don't wish him well (politically) - but neither do I wish him ill as a 'punishment' for his defection.  
    • Agree with all the sentiments above. Hope it doesn't change too much and above all I really hope it stays independent and avoids becoming the same as all the chain pubs in the area.
    • This move won't advance his career in Southwark. He'll have to leave the cabinet now for a couple of months and won't get back on it in May. He might win a council seat but the Greens won't win control of the council and Labour won't have him anywhere near the levers of power. His only (and presumably intended) route for advancement will be for the Greens to offer him PCC seat somewhere in the general election in 2029. By then the Greens will be toast. They might even be finished by this Friday if they don't win the Gorton by-election. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...