Jump to content

Giving birth at Kings/Lewisham/Guys & St Thomas's

aelizabeth

By aelizabeth
in The Family Room Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

aelizabeth

aelizabeth

Posted
Posted

Hi


Sorry for repeating old threads, but would be great to hear from recent mum's on their experiences of giving birth at Kings/Lewisham/Guys & ST Thomas's.


I know every experience is different, but I'm contemplating swapping from Kings to Lewisham (I live bang in between the two) and I'm really torn.


I know Kings is outstanding, but I think I'd like to give birth in a midwife-led birthing suite, and I know Kings only offers 2 of these rooms versus 5 at Lewisham. Also looking at Which? it seems that Kings has much fewer beds (9 vs 16) for the same number of babies delivered so I'm really worried about how busy Kings will be (a worry that has been reinforced by some horror stories from friends)


Would love to hear about other people's experiences


AE

midivydale

midivydale

Posted
Posted
Hi and congratulations! I gave birth for the second time at Kings 8 weeks ago. Again the care I received was outstanding. Yes it?s busy and the postnatal Ward isn?t great fun but from I hear I think that?s the same st both Lewisham and st Thomas. Best of luck, for me Kings was a given as if went wrong (they did first time around) I knew that the care would be great (it was). You will be fine wherever you go. x
chica9

chica9

Posted
Posted
From what I understand, both centres have really improved and are keen to have more babies born in the midwife-led units. It?s worth contacting them both to find out whether you are likely to meet their criteria for having a baby in the midwife- led units though - I found the criteria were pretty strict and have failed to meet them both times! So it?s worth thinking about how you would feel if you ended up on the main labour ward of each hospital. That said, those people I know who have been able to birth their babies in the (midwife led)lewisham birth centre speak really highly of the experience.
ruthief

ruthief

Posted
Posted
If you are considering the midwife-led suite, have you thought about a homebirth? We just had an amazing homebirth through the Lewisham community midwives (our first was born at Kings) and I would totally recommend it. As someone posted above, the midwifery unit has strict criteria for use, but homebirth is a bit more relaxed (we wouldn't have been able to use the midwifery unit for example, as I was 'overdue' at 42+1 and outside hospital policy, but still able to have a wonderful homebirth in the pool). You also benefit from caseloading midwife care for homebirth at kings and they are moving to this at Lewisham too which means continuity of care through 0regnancy and postnatal.
zoester

zoester

Posted
Posted
I have had the same concern, I am in the early stages but was discussing with the midwife yesterday and she said that because Kings has such a high number of home births there is rarely an occasion where the midwifery suites are over booked. I really hope that is true as I just don't have the space for a home birth and the thought of a ward intimidates me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Blah Blah
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Blah Blah · Posted

      Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Jules-and-Boo
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Jules-and-Boo · Posted

      Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • snowy
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By snowy · Posted

      That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...