Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Quote: taken from a forest hill forum to spread the news, Admin, I hope this is OK to report on.


Families of loved ones at the crematorium in Brockley Way describe being heartbroken by the actions of Southwark Council.


Patrick Whelan, whose daughter?s ashes are scattered by her bench, said it was ?absolutely disgusting? that he had to bring her memorial home.


His daughter, Karen Whelan, died 12 years ago aged 37.


?It is so disrespectful,? he added. ?I have other relatives whose ashes are scattered around the bench and when we visit it feels like they are there with us.?


He said the council told him his 10-year tenure was up, but he claims to never have signed such a contract.


?There is no tenure they just want to redevelop,? Patrick said. ?I asked them to show me my signed tenure, but they said they didn?t have it.


?There are benches that have been there since 1938, I don?t think those families have been paying a 10-year tenure.?


Cathy Erskine, 54, was one of the first to come forward after learning her dad?s bench had been removed.


She claims no notice was placed on her bench and argues she would have brought it back to her garden if she had known.


Cathy told News Shopper: ?I am absolutely fuming. My poor step mum is in her 80s and is heartbroken.


?My dad?s bench was nowhere near the redevelopment. I did see more benches that had been removed and put in the yard in the gardens. I am so stressed over this.?


It has been reported other benches have also been removed from the crematorium.


Councillor Richard Livingstone said: ?We are very sorry for the distress caused by ongoing work to improve Honor Oak Crematorium.


?We hope to create a new burial and memorial space for the future, including a new, dedicated peace garden for babies and children?s memorials, as well as creating a more pleasant, peaceful and well-maintained site for families.


?We are very aware that this work can have an impact on people who visit the memorials of loved ones in this part of the crematorium.


?We ensured notices advising of the changes and how to contact us about them, were in the area from April this year and we are already working with Mrs Erskine and other families and would encourage anyone with concerns or questions to get in touch with us now.?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Aria came round and quickly found a simple solution to a leaking shower. No fuss and avoided complicated work. Excellent
    • Comparing to Week 11 last season, the table is a lot more compact, even the distance between top and bottom is half of what it was when RC was a runaway leader on 90+ points. Also worth remembering there are 25 or so game weeks left, so any points difference can slowly be eroded away. Week 11 points...   Week 11 table....      
    • Some people don’t like it, some people will love it.  It doesn’t bother me at all. In fact I quite like it. I do not like assumptions you make about ‘elderly people’. 
    • This concerns me as it essentially disregards the significant number of people who do experience a high level of disruption because of the event.  While it's great that you personally are not inconvenienced, this is absolutely not the case for a great many residents many of whom are elderly or who do not have private gardens and rely on the park.   Great that you have a PHD in ecology but might also be worth reading the report into the environmental impact of Gala which paints a rather different story to yours. This comes round every year with a request to extend. This seems to me to be a distraction to steer everyone away from the main event. However, Southwark Council and Councillor Catherine Rose in particular must bear responsibility for what is effectively privatisation of our community space.  I requested data on the results of the last consultations and had to use a subject access request to get it.  In 2024 the council received 111 responses of which 108 were negative. The event went ahead. Last year they received 136 of which 82 were negative and 34 said only with major changes (which did not happen).   The impact of the event on the community and the enviroment is well-documented.  The council has so far refused to supply data on the demographics of the attendees but it doesn't take much to work out that this is largely single under 30s from out of borough judging by the steady stream of people from the station.   Please do take time to protest and also to email Events as we try to hold the council accountable for their disregard of the public consultation results. Appendix 1.pdf 2025 consultation.pdf
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...