Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all


I was asked to look into what the council can do regarding this and I am afraid that there is not much at all.


?Assessing, seizing and rescuing animals is beyond the councils remit as unfortunately we do not have any responsibility for animal welfare unless it relates to the following below. In this case it would be for the RSPCA to attend and assess the allegations.


The council has responsibility for:-

Animals kept in such a manner as to cause a statutory nuisance (barking dogs, odour of dung, fly infestations, etc.)

Licensing dangerous wild animals enclosures

Licensing commercial catteries and kennels

Fining people for letting their dog poop and not picking it up?


I hope that the matter is resolved informally with the business or, if necessary, with the RSPCA.


Best wishes

James

  • 8 months later...

The issue seems live again.


supersammyc wrote today at https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,2057304

-------------------------------------------------------

> I posted something about this several months ago

> and it prompted quite some debate. Thanks all that

> went to speak to the shop owner.

> Walking past Lordship Dry Cleaners and noticing

> the same tiny fish tank in the back of the shop

> (previously was on the front desk) with the same

> poor terrapins (now bigger) desperately swimming

> about to breath but having very little to perch on

> (they have to almost constantly swim about) was

> really disappointing. Why are human beings just so

> stupid needing to imprison animals like this?!

> These little animals are NOT enjoying themselves.

> What can be done?!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was normal cyclists, in rush hour traffic, in the dark, in the rain. Just really want people to realise it’s that time of year even more careful and to get kitted out.
    • The other consideration is that users of Lime bikes and similar, plus younger pedal cyclists, probably don't view themselves as 'cyclists' as such and so don't get kitted out or even consider that they need to. I also agree that earlier nights are another factor for the casual or hire bike user more used to cycling in the summer. I don't think I have ever seen a hire bike or scooter user wearing a helmet or reflective gear- presumably that is because the bike is just viewed as a transport tool for short term use and users do not want to be encumbered by any of the safety gear? Before anyone jumps on me for anecdotal evidence and speculation, this is just what I have seen round here, there may be hordes of similar users elsewhere that are kitted out.
    • Well apolitical if that is an OK word for you.  Sorry if my choice of words was incorrect.  But on my original point if it wasn't for the Telegraph dragging this up, and yes they do have an agenda, an no they are not apolitical/impartial whatever, we;d be none the wiser. But as it made no difference to Trump's election campaign that why would he have a case in the American courts? Irrespective of the rights and wrongs of the programme
    • If she took a bus, has she tried contacting the bus company? Long shot, but you never know!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...